you can fake ANI ... of course they'd have to guess / known the number.. which would lean towards inside job. Just make sure they sign off on usage charges and any spying liability. Or email them every time someone goes into the conference bridge, live monitoring, so they will be alerted if someone that shouldn't be in there is. Or email them a recording of the call after each time its used,so they know who was in there. Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919 Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com https://twitter.com/AlohaTone Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU <http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs> Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability <http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com> wrote:
We have outbound conferencing also, they don't want that. They already do have HD conferencing and some web control of conferences. This is purely about their standard inbound conferencing not having a PIN. Alex's suggestion about ANI made me think of a compromise where their internal callers (80% of callers) would have no PIN. This still exposes their board conversation to random peons in the company, but at least it doesn't affect our side of it and stops the random outside users.
There would be no exorbitant billing opportunity here, since they are locked to 100 channels and pay a flat usage fee for them.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Garrett Smith <garrett at pitchpivot.com> wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Check out ZipDX - they have a patented identity based conferencing that eliminates the need for pins by calling out to the meeting attendees. The system is used primarily for sensitive calls - investors, market research, executives and was developed to stop the inconveniences of pins and unsecured conference calls.
Can be customized to needs and they've also got a partner program.
You can learn more here: www.ZipDX.info or I'd be happy to put you in touch with someone their.
Garrett
*Garrett Smith* Founder
*Pitch + Pivot, LLC* Website: PitchPivot.com Email: garrett at pitchpivot.com Office: 716-322-3101 Cell: 716-903-9495 LinkedIn: /in/garrettsmith <http://www.linkedin.com/in/garrettsmith> Twitter: @garrettsmith <http://www.twitter.com/garrettsmith>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com> wrote:
We have a customer who has been nagging us to remove the PIN from their conference lines. They are getting more insistent. We've said no, for the obvious security reasons, and explained them all clearly. On top of it, this is a medical-related company having sensitive conversations on conferences. They keep pushing us. What would you do? On the one hand I think we have no liability in the matter, but on the other, we're more of a consulting ITSP than just a generic service provider. We specialize in helping people not do stupid things with their phone system. There's also the matter of just eating up a bunch of channels by people using it as their own conference.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops