One could argue that limited caching is acceptable (a day? a week?) Six months is a bit inappropriate. David. ----- On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Lee Riemer wrote:
Sounds like CNAM caching.
On 2/4/2010 10:13 AM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
On 2/4/10 7:59 AM, David Birnbaum wrote:
It sure sounds like it. TWTC is "cheating", I suppose, and depriving the rightful owner of that number of their CNAM revenue (should you take the carrier view of things).
Regardless of what the "best" answer is, in the US all carriers are supposed to deliver CNAM by dipping the central database, paying the owning carrier, and delivering the result to their subscriber. But that's really a discussion for another thread.
Another "cheater" that has a very annoying policy... Cox Communications seems to have a 6-18 month lag in their CNAM update policy. I really don't know how they do it (download and store all CNAM?), but all CNAM changes take a very long time to reach their customers. It's a source of constant complaints when our customers (businesses) call their homes (Cox) and get an old CNAM.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops