The first number is definitely clearer and uniform volume. The second one I also heard a loud click, no music and her voice was weak and got stronger. However neither seemed to have the warmth and clarity I would expect from a full ulaw path the whole way through. ~Jared On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Nathan Anderson <nathana at fsr.com> wrote:
Never said you were. :-) But I will continue to be coy about the details for the time being because I don't want to influence the other responses...
-- Nathan
-----Original Message----- From: Joshua Goldbard [mailto:j at 2600hz.com] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 6:40 PM To: Gabriel Gunderson Cc: Nathan Anderson; voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call quality issue / survey
See I'm not crazy!! Lol
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 8, 2013, at 6:29 PM, "Gabriel Gunderson" <gabe at gundy.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Nathan Anderson <nathana at fsr.com> wrote:
Calls placed from XO eSIP and AT&T cell, exact same results:
208-301-5083 :00 No ringback :01.5 Music starts :03 Silence and then woman speaking on the IVR. Consistent volume
208-301-5084 :00 No ringback :07 Loud click :10 Her voice is very weak and fades in (and is somewhat choppy) :12 Normal from that point forward
208-301-5083 is far and away better. Sounds better, starts quicker, no awkward silence.
What do I win for playing?
Best, Gabe _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops