is there a real need to use 1.6 in a production environment for you? On Dec 17, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 12/17/2009 12:24 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
On 12/17/09 9:29 AM, David Hiers wrote:
I've been snooping around our production systems, and the base code version for everything that we run in the call path is between 2 and 3 years old. It is patched to a fare-thee-well, and the stuff runs quite well.
That's interesting to hear, because people look at me like I have three heads when I say our main production switching is still on Asterisk 1.2. I can't see upgrading production systems with any major revs (we have applied patches because of security/stability fixes). I haven't found a compelling business case for buying new servers just to load up the new version until recently.
I know people who still run 1.2.x adamantly on the same basic premise. I do look at them like they're crazy now, but even as recently as a year and a half ago, I would not have necessarily. There seems to be an informal consensus that 1.4.18 was the first "serious" stable 1.4.x release.
I've run into enough problems with 1.6.x crashing that I have no faith in it as of yet. Why, I just had an installation in production mysteriously segfault this morning...
-- Alex
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops