That announcement by VoIP.ms predates the bandwidth.com resolution. Also, why wouldn't VoIP.MS (or rather, their host webhosting companies) have PNIs with bandwidth.com? Oh, well, maybe because like many other VoIP providers, their IP network sucks. Few POPs, no IXes, a technical activity (BGP peering) requires a trip to the account team, etc. https://peeringdb.com/net/1835 https://radar.qrator.net/as12130/peerings#startDate=2021-06-26&endDate=2021-... ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Mundy via VoiceOps" <voiceops at voiceops.org> To: "VoiceOps" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 1:47:18 AM Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Bandwidth East Coast Issues Not sure if Slashdot does... https://tech.slashdot.org/story/21/09/26/0014216/voipms-battles-week-long-su...
On 26/09/2021, at 12:47 PM, Peter Beckman via VoiceOps <voiceops at voiceops.org> wrote:
BW Considers the incident resolved.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops