March 18, 2013
6:57 p.m.
On Monday, March 18, 2013 3:44 PM, Alex Balashov <> wrote:
Isn't this what Dan York & Sonus's P-Charge-Info idea was meant to address?
Yes indeed. I actually ran across this IETF draft over the weekend; I posted my original message on Friday evening but it got held up. I have tried feeding P-Charge-Info to a couple of providers, but apparently the ones I'm using don't support it. I also found some evidence suggesting that some providers honor a field called "Charge" (which I cannot find referenced in any IETF docs, draft or otherwise) that is formatted pretty much exactly the same way as "P-Charge-Info", but adding that field didn't have any effect, either. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nathana at fsr.com