Are low re-registration intervals and flurries of OPTIONS pings and/or CRLF keepalives over UDP better for mobile batteries? :-) -- Alex
On Jul 17, 2017, at 5:12 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboogie0 at gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 July 2017 at 19:28, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote: Overall TCP just always seems to work, and UPD depends on the situation of the network. TCP is better for battery consumption on mobile sip applications as well.
Knowing that TCP uses more overhead just by being TCP, is it really better for mobile phone batteries?
-- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie at sip2sip.info _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops