Also, does anyone have a connection with Paetec, that they can try a test call to 217-777-0001? I?ve got a customer with a toll free number with Petec that won?t complete and they won?t help me. Arrggg. Thanks, Adam From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 8:18 AM To: Jared Geiger Cc: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 Jared, wondering if Hypercube ever got back with you? I?ve here a couple people tell me now that Hypercube has the lowest rate for 217/777 so I?m wondering if most LCR engines choose that carrier. Adam From: compuwizz at gmail.com [mailto:compuwizz at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jared Geiger Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:20 PM To: Adam Vocks Cc: VoiceOps Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 I have a trouble ticket open with Hypercube. Their rate is super low for this NPA/NXX and is the route has long PDD then fails. So I'm wondering if once this route is fixed, if most everyone else's routes will get fixed. I guess Level3 fixing it will help as well. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Adam Vocks <Adam.Vocks at cticomputers.com> wrote: I'm really hoping Level3 is having a routing issue with our code. Some tried a call on level3 to us which failed. Odd things is that Level3 is directly connected to the Tandem we subtend. I wouldn't think Level3 would send it off their network??? Adam -----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:30 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777 What's worse really is not that you have to look at ILEC tandems out of area - they don't perform any route filtering, if the originating caller is calling out of area, it gets sent to their PIC/LPIC LD carrier. So what you really need is every IXC in the country to make sure they have a route to you either directly, through whatever tandem homing arrangements you have, or via another IXC (really common especially in rural areas to see a Level 3/Global Crossing hand off to Qwest/AT&T/Verizon for the final termination.). -Paul On 07/15/2014 10:52 AM, Adam Vocks wrote:
So, at the very least, I need to start looking at each of the ILEC's tandems in a specific LATA?
Adam
-----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:48 AM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] New Exchange 217/777
On 07/15/2014 10:44 AM, Adam Vocks wrote:
:-)
Take Kidd's call from Verizon in Colorado. If there isn't our exchange in their local switch, do they forward the call on to another switch in hopes that it will know where to send it? Similar to a default gateway in IP world? It would get kicked up to an ILEC tandem inside that LATA. There is really no default gateway beyond that; at that point, you've already exited into what the IP world would call "default route-free" or "Tier
1" routing space.
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-678-954-0670 <tel:%2B1-678-954-0670> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
Please be kind to the English language:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906 _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops