This was my experience as well. 5083 is better. Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 ---------------------------------------- From: "Gabriel Gunderson" <gabe at gundy.org> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:29 PM To: "Nathan Anderson" <nathana at fsr.com> Cc: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call quality issue / survey On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Nathan Anderson <nathana at fsr.com> wrote: Calls placed from XO eSIP and AT&T cell, exact same results:
208-301-5083 :00 No ringback :01.5 Music starts :03 Silence and then woman speaking on the IVR. Consistent volume
208-301-5084 :00 No ringback :07 Loud click :10 Her voice is very weak and fades in (and is somewhat choppy) :12 Normal from that point forward
208-301-5083 is far and away better. Sounds better, starts quicker, no awkward silence. What do I win for playing? Best, Gabe _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops