my point was that they, of all
things, are a poor standard
bearer for the NFV marketing-
gasm.
With centralized licensing and the ability to scale resources when and where you need them, I would argue they are the perfect device for the NFV marketing-gasm (LOL). On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
On 04/06/2016 10:54 PM, Ryan Delgrosso wrote:
an SBC ... is a demarcation and control point between network
segments where you can inject interworking and business logic.
Absolutely, at >= Layer 5.
If it's news to anyone here that you can virtualise applications, they've got some catching up to do.
Anyway, my argument wasn't that SBCs serve no valid purposes. You've done a good job of outlining them. Instead, my point was that they, of all things, are a poor standard bearer for the NFV marketing-gasm.
-- Alex
-- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops