I would assume if you have to ask the question, the customer will have the expectation that it will work, and I'd imagine you'd want the customer to have the perception this is a quality service that meets or exceeds the specs of the product they're replacing (probably POTS), and thus you wouldn't want a feature gap, even if you didn't see 811 as a "feature" per se. David Hiers wrote:
No good reason not to support it; its just that legal/regulatory requirements go into the priority queue of the project plan.
David
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Paul Timmins<paul at timmins.net> wrote:
Even if you're not required to, why wouldn't you? The infrastructure you save may be your own or something you depend on.
David Hiers wrote:
The recent backhoe-fade issue brings up an interesting topic:
As VOIP networks, are we legally required to provide 811 services?
I"m pretty sure that we're exempt, want to kick it around with the group for a consensus view....
David _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops