Google itself also blocks traffic pumpers on Google Voice, though they've long argued they shouldn't be subject to regulation as a carrier: https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/voice/pmkQ58_HEfo I understand where you're coming from David, but these services are total scams taking advantage of small carriers desire to increase revenue and consumers lack of understanding about how these services operate and are paid for. Anyone being honest about this can't possibly argue that these aren't a dishonest form of cost shifting onto providers like me. I've not gone to the lengths of a provider like Speakeasy, but I understand where they're coming from. This kind of calling is a measurable impact on revenue in a competitive market. At wholesale, it's often a great deal cheaper for me to have customers calling China than it is virtually all of these kinds of services. It's not at all fair - to anyone involved - to burden an intermediary, much less one that's significantly encumbered by regulation, with this cost. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David Thompson <dthompson at esi-estech.com> wrote:
Those are the providers you need to avoid. If they can't understand that in business you win some and you lose some hopefully at the end of the quarter you come out on top then they are probably already walking a thin line between profitability and losing money. In which case you may find yourself one morning without any dial tone and stuck in a nightmare that may take months to repair as you try and port your numbers out.
David Thompson Network Services Support Technician (O) 858.357.8794 (F) 858-225-1882 (E) dthompson at esi-estech.com (W) www.esi-estech.com
-----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Seelye Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 3:18 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Rural call completion hotline
Look at the speakeasy link. They're willfully and publicly declining to terminate traffic to certain NPA-NXXs.
-Aaron
On 5/6/2015 7:22 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
What do you mean? Did you mean to say list? What list?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Frank Bulk <frnkblk at iname.com <mailto:frnkblk at iname.com>> wrote:
Ouch. Several of our CLEC NPA-NXX'es on that last. Checking with legal.
Frank
-----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>] On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 12:08 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Rural call completion hotline
On 5/4/15 1:29 PM, David Thompson wrote: > Finally someone's taking a stand about this. Unacceptable in 2015 in > America that you cannot call coast to coast and expect the call to be > connected.
Some people just say no. I suspect that this isn't exactly legal.
http://www.speakeasy.net/tos/blocked.php
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net <mailto:jay at impulse.net> Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 <tel:805%20884-6323> - WB6RDV _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops