Calvin, I wonder if you got any insight to this question? Regards, Oren On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:01 PM Calvin Ellison <calvin.ellison at voxox.com> wrote:
It looks like Somos is pushing TFN CNAM, press release below from Mar 30, 2020. I've always understood TF ANI to be invalid.
What's the news on using TFN as a caller ID? Does this require a local charge number in P-Charge-Info or P_Asserted_Identity or elsewhere? Has the FCC or anyone else approved TFN as ANI? Is TF ANI supported for STIR/SHAKEN?
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toll-free-caller-id-information-hel...
Regards,
*Calvin Ellison* Senior Voice Operations Engineer calvin.ellison at voxox.com _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops