
Jan. 18, 2013
1:29 p.m.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Joshua Goldbard <j at 2600hz.com> wrote:
We run our e911 through a service as well but price per location as opposed to per phone. We've also found that, if possible, binding the e911 to a did is preferable to device binding.
We price per location also. The extension binding versus device binding is confusing to me; don't you give a customer the same DID to ring all of their devices? That's what we do, so the home phone and office ring concurrently. -- Carlos Alvarez TelEvolve 602-889-3003