On 12/9/12, Carlos Alvarez <carlos at televolve.com> wrote: [snip]
The whole thing seems like an ignored joke. I'm thinking about it as we cut over a medium-size new customer from a major national provider, and I don't see stickers or warnings anywhere in the building.
Using that logic.. there are lots of ignored "jokes"; things like selecting strong passwords, yield signs, road speed limits. They may be a joke 90% of the time. But the 10% of the time they aren't, significant cash could be at stake in the resulting tort case... You're referring to the "No/Limited 911 service" type stickers that may have been provided for portable devices by some providers? They might be treating it as a joke at their own risk, or at their provider's risk. Ultimately, I would suggest, it's up to lawyers and their orgs' respective Infosec personnel for the provider/customer orgs to figure out if there is a joke, and who the joke is on....
Carlos Alvarez -- -JH