I have had the same problem with the Cisco SPA ATAs (Linksys). I was able to get the SPA ATA to honor the ACME SBC settings, but as Scott says below, the registration values can't be more than 50% apart. On a related note... I also found was that the SPA2102 and SPA8000 ATA software re-registers "3" sec before the timer expires; for example, if the registration timer set by ACME on the ATA is set to 205 seconds, the ATA will attempt to re-register every 202 seconds. This is much different from the Cisco SPA phones, which register at 67% of the set reg timer value. The "3" sec re-registration timer is NOT a configurable value as it is set in the software. So, you will need to adjust your desired registration timer on the SBC for the ATAs to match what your Firewall UDP timers are expecting (if that is an issue for your CPE setup). Otherwise, your SIP ports will be shut-down pre-maturely. This was a problem for us. -----Original Message----- From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of voiceops-request at voiceops.org Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 8:51 AM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: VoiceOps Digest, Vol 32, Issue 1 Send VoiceOps mailing list submissions to voiceops at voiceops.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to voiceops-request at voiceops.org You can reach the person managing the list at voiceops-owner at voiceops.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of VoiceOps digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Linksys PAP2T (Mark Holloway) 2. Re: Linksys PAP2T (Scott Berkman) 3. Experiences with VoIP and 100+ seat sites (Darren Schreiber) 4. Re: Experiences with VoIP and 100+ seat sites (Carlos Alvarez) 5. Re: Experiences with VoIP and 100+ seat sites (Zak Rupas) 6. Re: Experiences with VoIP and 100+ seat sites (Carlos Alvarez) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:05:30 -0700 From: Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> To: VoiceOps <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Linksys PAP2T Message-ID: <77FD9C82-4778-4889-A573-7810BF41B43A at markholloway.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Has anyone encountered an issue where the PAP2T isn't honoring the registration timer in the contact header sent by an Acme Packet SD to the PAP2T? Any suggestions are appreciated. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:31:17 -0500 From: "Scott Berkman" <scott at sberkman.net> To: "'Mark Holloway'" <mh at markholloway.com>, "'VoiceOps'" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Linksys PAP2T Message-ID: <033301cce081$33f1f640$9bd5e2c0$@sberkman.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" What is the Acme trying to set the timer to, and how does that compare to the default registration interval in the Linksys? I think they can't be more than 50% apart (so if the Linksys is set to 3600, and the Acme suggests 30, that's too much of a difference and you'd need to lower the interval on the Linksys). There are also settings for min and max registration interval on the SIP settings page. -----Original Message----- From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 6:06 PM To: VoiceOps Subject: [VoiceOps] Linksys PAP2T Has anyone encountered an issue where the PAP2T isn't honoring the registration timer in the contact header sent by an Acme Packet SD to the PAP2T? Any suggestions are appreciated. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:25:27 -0800 From: Darren Schreiber <d at d-man.org> To: "VoiceOps at voiceops.org" <VoiceOps at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Experiences with VoIP and 100+ seat sites Message-ID: <CB4EA777.482AB%d at d-man.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi folks, I'd love to hear some stories (good or bad) of hosted PBX VoIP installs on 100+ seat sites (single site). Specifically if you've done this with Broadsoft or another solidified switch. I have mixed opinions on how this type of scenario can be successful and now I'm being pressed by a client on a formal opinion. I figure having it based on experience from others on a similar product is worth hearing about. Specifically curious about how you addressed call quality issues and ensured bandwidth and uplink were sufficient. As much detail as you're willing would be great, on or off list. Thanks, Darren