What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
In the following order. 1. Yealink, (T41P, T46G, T48G) Easy to configure. Easy to upgrade. Just works. No real bugs that I've found. 2. Polycom, (IP330, 550, 650..etc) Just works. Not as easy to configure. Has a few oddities. But once it's up. It's pretty solid. 3. Grandstream. (GXP2140) Haven't had much seat time with them. But they might unseat polycom from the number two spot. Easy to upgrade/configure like the yealink. Just stay away from the android based ones. I've had some real issues with those. Used with Asterisk, Mostly in a hosted PBX environment. I really like the easy of using more advanced features in the yealink, Like multicast paging. BLF is super simple..etc. I will say though. I've got two Polycom IP650's in use at a local pizza place. Phones have queues on them for when customers call in. And are really put through hell. Hundreds of calls a day. Absolutely covered in flour and pizza. (The phone handsets are physically shiny now it's been handled so much). And it just keeps chugging (knock on wood). Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 ---------------------------------------- From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
Nick, Thanks this is exactly what I am looking for. Yealink seems to be the up and comer. How is their support? Their documentation and release notes look like a joke, so I am a little concerned. There doesn't seem to be much version tracking on bug fix numbering like Polycom is known for. Is there a reason to use the old Polycom IP line since the VVX series has replaced it? The Grandstream GXP2140 looks like one hell of a deal for under $100 including 24BLF keys, but it looks like it looks like it has a paper insert for the BLFs. In todays world with ever changing add moves drops do you really think paper labels are even a viable option? Seems like a nightmare to me. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nick Olsen <nick at flhsi.com> wrote:
In the following order.
1. Yealink, (T41P, T46G, T48G) Easy to configure. Easy to upgrade. Just works. No real bugs that I've found. 2. Polycom, (IP330, 550, 650..etc) Just works. Not as easy to configure. Has a few oddities. But once it's up. It's pretty solid. 3. Grandstream. (GXP2140) Haven't had much seat time with them. But they might unseat polycom from the number two spot. Easy to upgrade/configure like the yealink. Just stay away from the android based ones. I've had some real issues with those.
Used with Asterisk, Mostly in a hosted PBX environment. I really like the easy of using more advanced features in the yealink, Like multicast paging. BLF is super simple..etc.
I will say though. I've got two Polycom IP650's in use at a local pizza place. Phones have queues on them for when customers call in. And are really put through hell. Hundreds of calls a day. Absolutely covered in flour and pizza. (The phone handsets are physically shiny now it's been handled so much). And it just keeps chugging (knock on wood).
Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
------------------------------ *From*: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> *Sent*: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM *To*: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> *Subject*: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Date: 3/26/15 11:25 am To: nick at flhsi.com Cc: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Nick, Thanks this is exactly what I am looking for. Yealink seems to be the up and comer. How is their support? Their documentation and release notes look like a joke, so I am a little concerned. There doesn't seem to be much version tracking on bug fix numbering like Polycom is known for. Is there a reason to use the old Polycom IP line since the VVX series has replaced it? Quite the opposite. Software development of the older SoundPoint models has ceased. The VVX series are still undergoing active development, so they will be more supportable over time. The Grandstream GXP2140 looks like one hell of a deal for under $100 including 24BLF keys, but it looks like it looks like it has a paper insert for the BLFs. In todays world with ever changing add moves drops do you really think paper labels are even a viable option? Seems like a nightmare to me. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nick Olsen <nick at flhsi.com> wrote: In the following order. 1. Yealink, (T41P, T46G, T48G) Easy to configure. Easy to upgrade. Just works. No real bugs that I've found. 2. Polycom, (IP330, 550, 650..etc) Just works. Not as easy to configure. Has a few oddities. But once it's up. It's pretty solid. 3. Grandstream. (GXP2140) Haven't had much seat time with them. But they might unseat polycom from the number two spot. Easy to upgrade/configure like the yealink. Just stay away from the android based ones. I've had some real issues with those. Used with Asterisk, Mostly in a hosted PBX environment. I really like the easy of using more advanced features in the yealink, Like multicast paging. BLF is super simple..etc. I will say though. I've got two Polycom IP650's in use at a local pizza place. Phones have queues on them for when customers call in. And are really put through hell. Hundreds of calls a day. Absolutely covered in flour and pizza. (The phone handsets are physically shiny now it's been handled so much). And it just keeps chugging (knock on wood). Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Graves, Thats what I was thinking, but hundreds of providers are still buying and selling the older line of Polycom phones, and I just don't understand why. They are typically more expensive than the VVX line, and have less features. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:37 AM, <mgraves at mstvp.com> wrote:
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Date: 3/26/15 11:25 am To: nick at flhsi.com Cc: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org>
Nick,
Thanks this is exactly what I am looking for. Yealink seems to be the up and comer. How is their support? Their documentation and release notes look like a joke, so I am a little concerned. There doesn't seem to be much version tracking on bug fix numbering like Polycom is known for.
Is there a reason to use the old Polycom IP line since the VVX series has replaced it?
Quite the opposite. Software development of the older SoundPoint models has ceased. The VVX series are still undergoing active development, so they will be more supportable over time.
The Grandstream GXP2140 looks like one hell of a deal for under $100 including 24BLF keys, but it looks like it looks like it has a paper insert for the BLFs. In todays world with ever changing add moves drops do you really think paper labels are even a viable option? Seems like a nightmare to me.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nick Olsen <nick at flhsi.com> wrote:
In the following order. 1. Yealink, (T41P, T46G, T48G) Easy to configure. Easy to upgrade. Just works. No real bugs that I've found. 2. Polycom, (IP330, 550, 650..etc) Just works. Not as easy to configure. Has a few oddities. But once it's up. It's pretty solid. 3. Grandstream. (GXP2140) Haven't had much seat time with them. But they might unseat polycom from the number two spot. Easy to upgrade/configure like the yealink. Just stay away from the android based ones. I've had some real issues with those. Used with Asterisk, Mostly in a hosted PBX environment. I really like the easy of using more advanced features in the yealink, Like multicast paging. BLF is super simple..etc. I will say though. I've got two Polycom IP650's in use at a local pizza place. Phones have queues on them for when customers call in. And are really put through hell. Hundreds of calls a day. Absolutely covered in flour and pizza. (The phone handsets are physically shiny now it's been handled so much). And it just keeps chugging (knock on wood). Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
------------------------------ *From*: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> *Sent*: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM *To*: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> *Subject*: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
On 03/26/2015 12:54 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
but hundreds of providers are still buying and selling the older line of Polycom phones, and I just don't understand why. They are typically more expensive than the VVX line, and have less features.
This is a theological topic. Some people love the new VVX phones, some people hate them, but there's a reason they're cheaper. I myself greatly prefer the "old" (SoundPoint) line, and am very fond of the sound and build quality of the IP330 and the IP450. When I need more phones, I will order more of those. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:21 AM Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
This is a theological topic.
That is certainly true.
I myself greatly prefer the "old" (SoundPoint) line, and am very fond of the sound and build quality of the IP330 and the IP450. When I need more phones, I will order more of those.
And I couldn't get the Polycom off my desk fast enough. First replaced by a Cisco SPA, and then by a series of Grandstreams (currently a GXV3275). The only time a customer has asked us for a Polycom specifically is for heavy speakerphone users.
On 03/26/2015 01:26 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
The only time a customer has asked us for a Polycom specifically is for heavy speakerphone users.
I was a heavy speakerphone user. Now I'm a heavy user of the Plantronics CS540 DECT headset, which integrates very nicely with Polycoms and has an electronic hook-switch cable specifically for that purpose. The overall build quality is also very good. It has a nice subjective "feel", just as the Cisco 79x series did. As for provisioning and managing them, especially on a one-off basis, it is indeed a pain. Not nearly as much of a pain as Cisco, but a pain for sure. I think the easiest provisioning I've seen is from Snom. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Alex brings up a good point; high end headset compatibility. For some of our customers, this is critical. I myself almost never use the handset. All of our professional clients (legal, consulting, medical) have at least some high-end wireless headsets. Having the phone integrate seamlessly with those is very important. Grandstream and Polycom are two that are supported perfectly by Plantronics. Your customers may or may not demand this, but do consider it. On the headset front, I absolutely love the Plantronics integrated headset system that does desk phone, cell phone, and computer all in one base. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:30 AM Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:26 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
The only time a customer has asked us for a Polycom specifically is for heavy speakerphone users.
I was a heavy speakerphone user. Now I'm a heavy user of the Plantronics CS540 DECT headset, which integrates very nicely with Polycoms and has an electronic hook-switch cable specifically for that purpose.
The overall build quality is also very good. It has a nice subjective "feel", just as the Cisco 79x series did.
As for provisioning and managing them, especially on a one-off basis, it is indeed a pain. Not nearly as much of a pain as Cisco, but a pain for sure. I think the easiest provisioning I've seen is from Snom.
-- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Polycom handsets have the best quality sound in my opinion. Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919 Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU <http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs> Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability <http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com> wrote:
Alex brings up a good point; high end headset compatibility. For some of our customers, this is critical. I myself almost never use the handset. All of our professional clients (legal, consulting, medical) have at least some high-end wireless headsets. Having the phone integrate seamlessly with those is very important. Grandstream and Polycom are two that are supported perfectly by Plantronics.
Your customers may or may not demand this, but do consider it.
On the headset front, I absolutely love the Plantronics integrated headset system that does desk phone, cell phone, and computer all in one base.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:30 AM Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:26 PM, Carlos Alvarez wrote:
The only time a customer has asked us for a Polycom specifically is for heavy speakerphone users.
I was a heavy speakerphone user. Now I'm a heavy user of the Plantronics CS540 DECT headset, which integrates very nicely with Polycoms and has an electronic hook-switch cable specifically for that purpose.
The overall build quality is also very good. It has a nice subjective "feel", just as the Cisco 79x series did.
As for provisioning and managing them, especially on a one-off basis, it is indeed a pain. Not nearly as much of a pain as Cisco, but a pain for sure. I think the easiest provisioning I've seen is from Snom.
-- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States
Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Nick, I suspect that many companies want consistency across the installed base, to simplify support. If you have thousands of SPIP450/550/650 installed it adds complexity to provision VVX additionally. The SPIP line still run v3.x or v4.x firmware. Most of the VVX line are running later v4.x firmware, with v5.x already available, but not loaded by default as yet. Michael --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Date: 3/26/15 11:54 am To: mgraves at mstvp.com Cc: nick at flhsi.com, "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Graves, Thats what I was thinking, but hundreds of providers are still buying and selling the older line of Polycom phones, and I just don't understand why. They are typically more expensive than the VVX line, and have less features. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:37 AM, <mgraves at mstvp.com> wrote: --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Date: 3/26/15 11:25 am To: nick at flhsi.com Cc: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Nick, Thanks this is exactly what I am looking for. Yealink seems to be the up and comer. How is their support? Their documentation and release notes look like a joke, so I am a little concerned. There doesn't seem to be much version tracking on bug fix numbering like Polycom is known for. Is there a reason to use the old Polycom IP line since the VVX series has replaced it? Quite the opposite. Software development of the older SoundPoint models has ceased. The VVX series are still undergoing active development, so they will be more supportable over time. The Grandstream GXP2140 looks like one hell of a deal for under $100 including 24BLF keys, but it looks like it looks like it has a paper insert for the BLFs. In todays world with ever changing add moves drops do you really think paper labels are even a viable option? Seems like a nightmare to me. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nick Olsen <nick at flhsi.com> wrote: In the following order. 1. Yealink, (T41P, T46G, T48G) Easy to configure. Easy to upgrade. Just works. No real bugs that I've found. 2. Polycom, (IP330, 550, 650..etc) Just works. Not as easy to configure. Has a few oddities. But once it's up. It's pretty solid. 3. Grandstream. (GXP2140) Haven't had much seat time with them. But they might unseat polycom from the number two spot. Easy to upgrade/configure like the yealink. Just stay away from the android based ones. I've had some real issues with those. Used with Asterisk, Mostly in a hosted PBX environment. I really like the easy of using more advanced features in the yealink, Like multicast paging. BLF is super simple..etc. I will say though. I've got two Polycom IP650's in use at a local pizza place. Phones have queues on them for when customers call in. And are really put through hell. Hundreds of calls a day. Absolutely covered in flour and pizza. (The phone handsets are physically shiny now it's been handled so much). And it just keeps chugging (knock on wood). Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Colton, Never had a reason to contact yealink support. So can't comment on that. Like I said, Solid product however. I guess just the fact that I've never had to contact them stands out. Oh, One annoying point. Most of their "Help" bullet points in the config are completely useless. For instance. They'll be an option that says something like "SIP Server Type" with a drop down option. The little help button next to it just says "Set SIP Server Type". Instead of giving a description of what the setting actually does. Haven't touched the VVX series just because I haven't had time to play with it yet. The GXP2140 I have sitting on my desk did NOT come with an attendant console. Ran just under 100 bucks from Steakwave. I would never use a Paper Based attendant console. Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 ---------------------------------------- From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:26 PM To: nick at flhsi.com Cc: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? Nick, Thanks this is exactly what I am looking for. Yealink seems to be the up and comer. How is their support? Their documentation and release notes look like a joke, so I am a little concerned. There doesn't seem to be much version tracking on bug fix numbering like Polycom is known for. Is there a reason to use the old Polycom IP line since the VVX series has replaced it? The Grandstream GXP2140 looks like one hell of a deal for under $100 including 24BLF keys, but it looks like it looks like it has a paper insert for the BLFs. In todays world with ever changing add moves drops do you really think paper labels are even a viable option? Seems like a nightmare to me. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nick Olsen <nick at flhsi.com> wrote: In the following order. 1. Yealink, (T41P, T46G, T48G) Easy to configure. Easy to upgrade. Just works. No real bugs that I've found. 2. Polycom, (IP330, 550, 650..etc) Just works. Not as easy to configure. Has a few oddities. But once it's up. It's pretty solid. 3. Grandstream. (GXP2140) Haven't had much seat time with them. But they might unseat polycom from the number two spot. Easy to upgrade/configure like the yealink. Just stay away from the android based ones. I've had some real issues with those. Used with Asterisk, Mostly in a hosted PBX environment. I really like the easy of using more advanced features in the yealink, Like multicast paging. BLF is super simple..etc. I will say though. I've got two Polycom IP650's in use at a local pizza place. Phones have queues on them for when customers call in. And are really put through hell. Hundreds of calls a day. Absolutely covered in flour and pizza. (The phone handsets are physically shiny now it's been handled so much). And it just keeps chugging (knock on wood). Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 ---------------------------------------- From: "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
On Mar 26, 2015, at 11:45 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
Polycom VVX phones, work well, solid and supported by our soft switch. Softswitch = Broadsoft Broadworks
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
We only provide hosted PBX service. Customers with premises based PBX buy SIP trunks or PRIs from us.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
FXS ports for overhead paging, door buzzers, fax machines, etc.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Grandstream, particularly the Android-powered ones are the ones I choose for my own desk and recommend to others. The standard non-Android ones are inexpensive, easy to manage, easy for users to figure out, and have a great customer acceptance for sound and overall quality. The Android models have really useful touchscreen features. Cisco SPA series are easy to manage, good quality, simple phones with reasonable features and capabilities. Price is decent. For years this was the line we recommended, until GS stepped up their quality. Right now GS is the only brand we're selling. We will support the SPA and Polycom non-VVX if a new customer already has them. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:46 AM Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600. Rob From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
the vvx400 is my goto phone. The 500 and 600 is only good if you do video. I like the 500 over the 600 for the cost. BUT I don't like finger prints on my screens... also, the logo is covered on idle in the 500 and 600 vs the 500 shows the company logos very nicely. Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919 Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU <http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs> Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability <http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rob Dawson <rdawson at force3.com> wrote:
I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600.
Rob
*From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Colton Conor *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM *To:* voiceops at voiceops.org *Subject:* [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Does anyone have experience with a Fanvil X5G? I have never even heard of Fanvil, but they are recommended by 3CX. This model has a cool digital sidecard built in, and the price is killer. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901 < anakaoka at trinet-hi.com> wrote:
the vvx400 is my goto phone. The 500 and 600 is only good if you do video. I like the 500 over the 600 for the cost. BUT I don't like finger prints on my screens... also, the logo is covered on idle in the 500 and 600 vs the 500 shows the company logos very nicely.
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com
Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919
Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com
Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU <http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs>
Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability <http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rob Dawson <rdawson at force3.com> wrote:
I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600.
Rob
*From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Colton Conor *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM *To:* voiceops at voiceops.org *Subject:* [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
We?ve had good luck overall with Aastra (now Mitel). Found it to be very flexible on availability of softkeys? customers like to have lots of them. So far, their new?ish 6867i has been great to work with on the MetaSwitch platform.
My vote goes to Polycom. Unlike cisco Polycom were designed for SIP. Although the Sound Point range is not appealing to the eye the performance has been solid. The models IP550 and IP650 are the favorites. In the VVX range 500 and 600 are still maturing. Broadsoft features are much easier to deploy on Polycom phones. Provisioning is seamless if you are using Broadsoft DMS as well. I gave up testing Yealink in 2011 because of their poor support. Kumudu Suriyaarachchi Sr. Systems Engineer P 484.534.4427 ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c<mailto:ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c>om www.alteva.com From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901 Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:57 PM To: Rob Dawson Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? the vvx400 is my goto phone. The 500 and 600 is only good if you do video. I like the 500 over the 600 for the cost. BUT I don't like finger prints on my screens... also, the logo is covered on idle in the 500 and 600 vs the 500 shows the company logos very nicely. Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com<mailto:anakaoka at trinet-hi.com> Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919 Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU<http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs> Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability<http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rob Dawson <rdawson at force3.com<mailto:rdawson at force3.com>> wrote: I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600. Rob From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>] On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information of Alteva and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should notify the author and delete this communication from your system, including any attachments. Any disclosure, copying, saving or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Alteva.
Cisco SPA series phones were designed for SIP, as all modern Cisco phones are. It's only the very old ones like the 7900 that were not. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Kumudu Suriyaarachchi < ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.com> wrote:
My vote goes to Polycom. Unlike cisco Polycom were designed for SIP.
Although the Sound Point range is not appealing to the eye the performance has been solid.
The models IP550 and IP650 are the favorites.
In the VVX range 500 and 600 are still maturing.
Broadsoft features are much easier to deploy on Polycom phones.
Provisioning is seamless if you are using Broadsoft DMS as well.
I gave up testing Yealink in 2011 because of their poor support.
*Kumudu Suriyaarachchi*
Sr. Systems Engineer
P 484.534.4427
*ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c <ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c>om*
*www.alteva.com <http://www.alteva.com>*
*From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901 *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:57 PM *To:* Rob Dawson *Cc:* voiceops at voiceops.org *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
the vvx400 is my goto phone. The 500 and 600 is only good if you do video. I like the 500 over the 600 for the cost. BUT I don't like finger prints on my screens... also, the logo is covered on idle in the 500 and 600 vs the 500 shows the company logos very nicely.
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com
Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919
Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com
Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU <http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs>
Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability <http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rob Dawson <rdawson at force3.com> wrote:
I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600.
Rob
*From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Colton Conor *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM *To:* voiceops at voiceops.org *Subject:* [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information of Alteva and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should notify the author and delete this communication from your system, including any attachments. Any disclosure, copying, saving or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Alteva.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
There are rumors of a new line of Cisco SIP phones that will come out in May of this year. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com> wrote:
Cisco SPA series phones were designed for SIP, as all modern Cisco phones are. It's only the very old ones like the 7900 that were not.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Kumudu Suriyaarachchi < ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.com> wrote:
My vote goes to Polycom. Unlike cisco Polycom were designed for SIP.
Although the Sound Point range is not appealing to the eye the performance has been solid.
The models IP550 and IP650 are the favorites.
In the VVX range 500 and 600 are still maturing.
Broadsoft features are much easier to deploy on Polycom phones.
Provisioning is seamless if you are using Broadsoft DMS as well.
I gave up testing Yealink in 2011 because of their poor support.
*Kumudu Suriyaarachchi*
Sr. Systems Engineer
P 484.534.4427
*ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c <ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c>om*
*www.alteva.com <http://www.alteva.com>*
*From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901 *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:57 PM *To:* Rob Dawson *Cc:* voiceops at voiceops.org *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
the vvx400 is my goto phone. The 500 and 600 is only good if you do video. I like the 500 over the 600 for the cost. BUT I don't like finger prints on my screens... also, the logo is covered on idle in the 500 and 600 vs the 500 shows the company logos very nicely.
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com
Direct: 808.356.2901 Fax : 808.356.2919
Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com
Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU <http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs>
Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability <http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rob Dawson <rdawson at force3.com> wrote:
I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600.
Rob
*From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *Colton Conor *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM *To:* voiceops at voiceops.org *Subject:* [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why?
What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with?
I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications.
Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information of Alteva and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should notify the author and delete this communication from your system, including any attachments. Any disclosure, copying, saving or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Alteva.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- [image: Ringfree Communications, Inc] <http://ringfree.biz/> David Wessell / President 828-575-0030 x101/ david at ringfree.biz Ringfree Communications, Inc Office: 828-575-0030 / Fax: 888-243-7830 PO BOX 1994 Hendersonville, NC 28793 http://ringfree.biz This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
There may be SIP firmware for ?traditional? i.e. non-SPA Cisco phones 78xx, 79xx phones, but little or mostly no documentation for support on third party PBXs, usually not a lot of feature parity, and some odd issues like problems with NTP, completely different screens, etc. It becomes very apparent in migrating users from SCCP to SIP. Even the dual stack SPA phones exhibit some significant changes between protocols, though they do support SIP well and are documented much better. Rob From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of David Wessell Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 3:32 PM To: Carlos Alvarez Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? There are rumors of a new line of Cisco SIP phones that will come out in May of this year. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Carlos Alvarez <caalvarez at gmail.com<mailto:caalvarez at gmail.com>> wrote: Cisco SPA series phones were designed for SIP, as all modern Cisco phones are. It's only the very old ones like the 7900 that were not. On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Kumudu Suriyaarachchi <ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.com<mailto:ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.com>> wrote: My vote goes to Polycom. Unlike cisco Polycom were designed for SIP. Although the Sound Point range is not appealing to the eye the performance has been solid. The models IP550 and IP650 are the favorites. In the VVX range 500 and 600 are still maturing. Broadsoft features are much easier to deploy on Polycom phones. Provisioning is seamless if you are using Broadsoft DMS as well. I gave up testing Yealink in 2011 because of their poor support. Kumudu Suriyaarachchi Sr. Systems Engineer P 484.534.4427<tel:484.534.4427> ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c<mailto:ksuriyaarachchi at alteva.c>om www.alteva.com<http://www.alteva.com> From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>] On Behalf Of Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901<tel:808.356.2901> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:57 PM To: Rob Dawson Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? the vvx400 is my goto phone. The 500 and 600 is only good if you do video. I like the 500 over the 600 for the cost. BUT I don't like finger prints on my screens... also, the logo is covered on idle in the 500 and 600 vs the 500 shows the company logos very nicely. Aryn H. K. Nakaoka anakaoka at trinet-hi.com<mailto:anakaoka at trinet-hi.com> Direct: 808.356.2901<tel:808.356.2901> Fax : 808.356.2919<tel:808.356.2919> Tri-net Solutions 733 Bishop St. #1170 Honolulu, HI 96813 http://www.trinet-hi.com Aloha Tone PBX <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96YWPY9wCeU<http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs> Aloha Tone (HA) High Availability<http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8> http://youtu.be/rJsr4k0RBH8 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rob Dawson <rdawson at force3.com<mailto:rdawson at force3.com>> wrote: I have supported all manner of Polycom endpoints on Broadsoft, Asterisk, sipXecs, etc. They have always been solid phones, with only an occasional failure here and there.They feel solid and look unoffensive. I really like the VVX 500 and 600, the 400 is OK, the 300 not so much. I would love to develop some content or an app to take advantage of the touchscreen displays on the 500 and 600. Rob From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>] On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:46 AM To: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] What is your favorite line of IP Phones and Why? What is your favorite line of IP phones and why? What PBX or softswitch do you use these line of phones with? I would love to hear responses for both Hosted PBX applications, and On-Prem PBX applications. Is there any reason or need to use non IP phones in todays environment? I know NEC, Avya, and others make multiple digital non SIP phone systems. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information of Alteva and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should notify the author and delete this communication from your system, including any attachments. Any disclosure, copying, saving or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Alteva. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops -- [Image removed by sender. Ringfree Communications, Inc]<http://ringfree.biz/> David Wessell / President 828-575-0030 x101/ david at ringfree.biz<mailto:david at ringfree.biz> Ringfree Communications, Inc Office: 828-575-0030 / Fax: 888-243-7830 PO BOX 1994 Hendersonville, NC 28793 http://ringfree.biz<http://ringfree.biz/> This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
participants (11)
-
abalashov＠evaristesys.com -
anakaoka＠trinet-hi.com -
caalvarez＠gmail.com -
colton.conor＠gmail.com -
david＠ringfree.biz -
ksuriyaarachchi＠alteva.com -
matthew＠corp.crocker.com -
mgraves＠mstvp.com -
mwiles＠akabis.com -
nick＠flhsi.com -
rdawson＠force3.com