Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net> | www.alliedtelecom.net<http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: [Description: cid:image002.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] facebook<http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> | [Description: cid:image003.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> | [Description: cid:image004.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036
Substantial? How many is that? :) -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry at suretec.co.uk Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ Suretec Systems is a limited company registered in Scotland. Registered number: SC258005. Registered office: 24 Cormack Park, Rothienorman, Inverurie, Aberdeenshire, AB51 8GL. Subject to disclaimer at http://www.suretecgroup.com/disclaimer.html Do you know we have our own VoIP provider called SureVoIP? See http://www.surevoip.co.uk On 17 Jan 2013, at 20:28, Robert Dawson <RDawson at alliedtelecom.net> wrote:
Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique.
<image001.png> Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net | www.alliedtelecom.net follow us: <image002.png> facebook | <image003.png> LinkedIn | <image004.png> twitter 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don't have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having? From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dawson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net> | www.alliedtelecom.net<http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: [Description: cid:image002.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] facebook<http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> | [Description: cid:image003.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> | [Description: cid:image004.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
Locking up randomly, mostly. Web portal will be responsive but a port will show offhook when it is not and incoming calls to both lines get rejected or both lines will fail to register. Sometimes the web portal becomes non-responsive. I'll be opening a ticket with Cisco ? just wanted to see if anyone had possibly been through this yet. From: <Jastak>, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com<mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com>> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:00 PM To: Robert Dawson <rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>>, "voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>" <voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>> Subject: RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don?t have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having? From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dawson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net> | www.alliedtelecom.net<http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: [Description: cid:image002.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] facebook<http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> | [Description: cid:image003.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> | [Description: cid:image004.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036 ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
Haven't see that with ours. What version of code did you deploy with the SPA1x2's? From: Robert Dawson [mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:04 PM To: Jastak, Eric (DS); voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Locking up randomly, mostly. Web portal will be responsive but a port will show offhook when it is not and incoming calls to both lines get rejected or both lines will fail to register. Sometimes the web portal becomes non-responsive. I'll be opening a ticket with Cisco - just wanted to see if anyone had possibly been through this yet. From: <Jastak>, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com<mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com>> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:00 PM To: Robert Dawson <rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>>, "voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>" <voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>> Subject: RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don't have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having? From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dawson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net> | www.alliedtelecom.net<http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: [Description: cid:image002.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] facebook<http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> | [Description: cid:image003.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> | [Description: cid:image004.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036 ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
Everything from 1.0.1 to 1.3.1. From: Jastak, Eric [mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:06 PM To: Robert Dawson; voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Haven?t see that with ours. What version of code did you deploy with the SPA1x2?s? From: Robert Dawson [mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net]<mailto:[mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:04 PM To: Jastak, Eric (DS); voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: Re: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Locking up randomly, mostly. Web portal will be responsive but a port will show offhook when it is not and incoming calls to both lines get rejected or both lines will fail to register. Sometimes the web portal becomes non-responsive. I'll be opening a ticket with Cisco ? just wanted to see if anyone had possibly been through this yet. From: <Jastak>, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com<mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com>> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:00 PM To: Robert Dawson <rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>>, "voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>" <voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>> Subject: RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don?t have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having? From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dawson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net> | www.alliedtelecom.net<http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: [Description: cid:image002.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] facebook<http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> | [Description: cid:image003.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> | [Description: cid:image004.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036 ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
Make sure you're using firmware version 1.3.1-003. The previous version v1.2.1-004 has major stability issues, memory leaks and SNMP issues. It crashes after a few days and requires a hard reboot to be restored. ---Chris On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Robert Dawson <RDawson at alliedtelecom.net> wrote:
Everything from 1.0.1 to 1.3.1.
From: Jastak, Eric [mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:06 PM To: Robert Dawson; voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
Haven?t see that with ours. What version of code did you deploy with the SPA1x2?s?
From: Robert Dawson [mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:04 PM To: Jastak, Eric (DS); voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
Locking up randomly, mostly. Web portal will be responsive but a port will show offhook when it is not and incoming calls to both lines get rejected or both lines will fail to register. Sometimes the web portal becomes non-responsive. I'll be opening a ticket with Cisco ? just wanted to see if anyone had possibly been through this yet.
From: <Jastak>, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com> Date: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:00 PM To: Robert Dawson <rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>, "voiceops at voiceops.org" <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don?t have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having?
From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dawson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models
Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique.
<image001.png> Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net | www.alliedtelecom.net follow us: <image002.png> facebook | <image003.png> LinkedIn | <image004.png> twitter 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Hi, we also experienced problems with customers using SPA-112 (to be exact: Cisco/SPA112-1.2.1(004)-rc) behaviour seemed to be different than similar Linksys fw/devices. One of the issues was Registration/Min expires handling (server sends minimum expires in contact header parameter which the ata seems to ignore) but i was not able to verify this myself (no equipment for testing) and i can not take the customers word for it... Best Regards Max M. On 01/23/2013 10:36 PM, Chris Wallace wrote:
Make sure you're using firmware version 1.3.1-003. The previous version v1.2.1-004 has major stability issues, memory leaks and SNMP issues. It crashes after a few days and requires a hard reboot to be restored.
---Chris
On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Robert Dawson <RDawson at alliedtelecom.net <mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net>> wrote:
Everything from 1.0.1 to 1.3.1. *From:*Jastak, Eric [mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com <http://adp.com>] *Sent:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:06 PM *To:*Robert Dawson; voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> *Subject:*RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Haven't see that with ours. What version of code did you deploy with the SPA1x2's? *From:*Robert Dawson[mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net] <mailto:[mailto:RDawson at alliedtelecom.net]> *Sent:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:04 PM *To:*Jastak, Eric (DS);voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> *Subject:*Re: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Locking up randomly, mostly. Web portal will be responsive but a port will show offhook when it is not and incoming calls to both lines get rejected or both lines will fail to register. Sometimes the web portal becomes non-responsive. I'll be opening a ticket with Cisco -- just wanted to see if anyone had possibly been through this yet. *From:*<Jastak>, Eric <Eric.Jastak at adp.com <mailto:Eric.Jastak at adp.com>> *Date:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:00 PM *To:*Robert Dawson <rdawson at alliedtelecom.net <mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>>, "voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>" <voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>> *Subject:*RE: Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don't have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having? *From:*voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>[mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]*On Behalf Of*Robert Dawson *Sent:*Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM *To:*voiceops at voiceops.org <mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> *Subject:*[VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. <image001.png>
*Robert Dawson* */Voice Systems Engineer/* (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net <mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net>|www.alliedtelecom.net <http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: <image002.png>facebook <http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> |<image003.png> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> |<image004.png> twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Sorry guys, meant to say ?haven?t? had any reported issues? From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jastak, Eric (DS) Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:00 PM To: Robert Dawson; voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models We just started deploying the SPA 112s recently. Have had any reported issues, but we don?t have a ton out there yet. What kind of problems are you having? From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Robert Dawson Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:28 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Issues with the "new" SPA1x2 models Anyone having good luck with these? Anyone with a substantial number deployed. They seem to be very flaky . . . just want to see if that experience is unique. [Description: cid:image001.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] Robert Dawson Voice Systems Engineer (o) 202-349-0477 | (f) 202-541-9050 rdawson at alliedtelecom.net<mailto:rdawson at alliedtelecom.net> | www.alliedtelecom.net<http://www.alliedtelecom.net/> follow us: [Description: cid:image002.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] facebook<http://www.facebook.com/alliedtelecom> | [Description: cid:image003.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-telecom-group> | [Description: cid:image004.png at 01CC5068.C9623860] twitter<http://twitter.com/#!/allied_telecom> 1120 20th Street, NW, Suite 500-South, Washington, DC 20036 ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
participants (5)
-
Eric.Jastak＠adp.com -
ghenry＠suretec.co.uk -
lists＠iamchriswallace.com -
mm＠42com.com -
RDawson＠alliedtelecom.net