How are the rest of you dealing with this? The amount of required or suggested info is too large for something small and discreet. Or you end up with super-fine print...does that meet the requirements? Do any of your customers actually use them if you hand them a pile? The whole thing seems like an ignored joke. I'm thinking about it as we cut over a medium-size new customer from a major national provider, and I don't see stickers or warnings anywhere in the building. -- Carlos Alvarez TelEvolve 602-889-3003
On 12/9/12, Carlos Alvarez <carlos at televolve.com> wrote: [snip]
The whole thing seems like an ignored joke. I'm thinking about it as we cut over a medium-size new customer from a major national provider, and I don't see stickers or warnings anywhere in the building.
Using that logic.. there are lots of ignored "jokes"; things like selecting strong passwords, yield signs, road speed limits. They may be a joke 90% of the time. But the 10% of the time they aren't, significant cash could be at stake in the resulting tort case... You're referring to the "No/Limited 911 service" type stickers that may have been provided for portable devices by some providers? They might be treating it as a joke at their own risk, or at their provider's risk. Ultimately, I would suggest, it's up to lawyers and their orgs' respective Infosec personnel for the provider/customer orgs to figure out if there is a joke, and who the joke is on....
Carlos Alvarez -- -JH
participants (2)
-
carlos＠televolve.com -
mysidia＠gmail.com