What are the differences between these two applications? I know homer is free and opensource, and VoIPMonitor is a paid application. Besides that what is the difference? Is there anything else out there for monitoring VoIP?
Palladion now owned by Oracles called OCOM. empirix is another company in this space. Both are commercial. Have 5 + years experience with Palladion. Nothing but praise for this solution. -------------------- Brian Sent from Mobile _____________________________ From: Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com<mailto:colton.conor at gmail.com>> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:06 PM Subject: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor To: <voiceops at voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops at voiceops.org>> What are the differences between these two applications? I know homer is free and opensource, and VoIPMonitor is a paid application. Besides that what is the difference? Is there anything else out there for monitoring VoIP?
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time.
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Geoffrey, What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious. Thanks, Brian On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org on behalf of gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Mostly around support. It was terrible. We also had a couple lengthy outages which crippled our support team.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Geoffrey,
What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious.
Thanks, Brian
On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org on behalf of gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Understood. We?ve been using a VAR for Palladion and now Oracle. So we never actually have to deal with Oracle. I?m going to test VoipMonitor early next year. --------------------------- Brian J Murray Director, Network Engineering On 11/19/15, 10:24 PM, "Geoffrey Mina" <gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
Mostly around support. It was terrible. We also had a couple lengthy outages which crippled our support team.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Geoffrey,
What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious.
Thanks, Brian
On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org on behalf of gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Ive used Voipmonitor for a few years now, it started out OK, but now.. its AWESOME. parts are open source ( mainly the sniffer / analyser ). the commercial part is the web UI. I cant praise it highly enough, and the price is excellent. Martin is also highly contactable and open to suggestion / bug reports. I know someone else who uses homer and loves it, but unless im mistaken, Homer only does SIP. Voipmonitor does our SIP and RTP. Jay On 20 November 2015 at 14:28, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Understood. We?ve been using a VAR for Palladion and now Oracle. So we never actually have to deal with Oracle.
I?m going to test VoipMonitor early next year.
--------------------------- Brian J Murray Director, Network Engineering
On 11/19/15, 10:24 PM, "Geoffrey Mina" <gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
Mostly around support. It was terrible. We also had a couple lengthy outages which crippled our support team.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Geoffrey,
What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious.
Thanks, Brian
On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" < voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org on behalf of gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Sincerely Jay
+1. On all points. Thanks, Shripal
On Nov 19, 2015, at 11:03 PM, jay binks <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:
Ive used Voipmonitor for a few years now, it started out OK, but now.. its AWESOME.
parts are open source ( mainly the sniffer / analyser ). the commercial part is the web UI.
I cant praise it highly enough, and the price is excellent. Martin is also highly contactable and open to suggestion / bug reports.
I know someone else who uses homer and loves it, but unless im mistaken, Homer only does SIP. Voipmonitor does our SIP and RTP.
Jay
On 20 November 2015 at 14:28, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote: Understood. We?ve been using a VAR for Palladion and now Oracle. So we never actually have to deal with Oracle.
I?m going to test VoipMonitor early next year.
--------------------------- Brian J Murray Director, Network Engineering
On 11/19/15, 10:24 PM, "Geoffrey Mina" <gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
Mostly around support. It was terrible. We also had a couple lengthy outages which crippled our support team.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Geoffrey,
What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious.
Thanks, Brian
On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org on behalf of gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Sincerely
Jay _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. This bring me back to the question of Polycom Phones with VQMON that use thee standard *RTCP-XR (IETF RFC 3611) format and can publish metrics using the SIP PUBLISH method. These are RTP stats for the most part right? It looks like Homer does support RTCP-XR as seen by this demo, and I know VoIPMonitor is working on it. I guess if you have an advanced phone/device that supports RTCP-XR is there a need to monitor RTP? Monitoring RTP (and recording every leg like VoIPMonitor does) takes up substantial resources I assume? On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:03 PM, jay binks <jaybinks at gmail.com> wrote:
Ive used Voipmonitor for a few years now, it started out OK, but now.. its AWESOME.
parts are open source ( mainly the sniffer / analyser ). the commercial part is the web UI.
I cant praise it highly enough, and the price is excellent. Martin is also highly contactable and open to suggestion / bug reports.
I know someone else who uses homer and loves it, but unless im mistaken, Homer only does SIP. Voipmonitor does our SIP and RTP.
Jay
On 20 November 2015 at 14:28, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Understood. We?ve been using a VAR for Palladion and now Oracle. So we never actually have to deal with Oracle.
I?m going to test VoipMonitor early next year.
--------------------------- Brian J Murray Director, Network Engineering
On 11/19/15, 10:24 PM, "Geoffrey Mina" <gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
Mostly around support. It was terrible. We also had a couple lengthy outages which crippled our support team.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Geoffrey,
What issues did you face with Palladion. Curious.
Thanks, Brian
On 11/19/15, 9:44 PM, "VoiceOps on behalf of Geoffrey Mina" < voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org on behalf of gmina at connectfirst.com> wrote:
We use VoipMonitor. It's the best that I have used. Definitely better in stability and support compared to Palladion.
On Nov 19, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jason Jessico <jjessico at gmail.com> wrote:
NetScout's nGeniusONE platform has a solid set of VOIP/SIP monitoring capabilities that I've gotten significant miles out of. HOMER is something I'd like to get up and going just to see it, but haven't had enough free time. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Sincerely
Jay
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor. Kidd On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
wrote:
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
Jumping on the VoIPmonitor bandwagon here; they've been more responsive than the average vendor to new feature requests. A memorable interaction went something like this: Voxox: "We'd like voipmon to do X." (e.g. process RTCP-XR and SIP PUBLISH reports from Polycom, or analyze a proprietary codec) VoIPMon: "We've had that on our roadmap for a while. Now that a customer (you) has requested X it will be moved to the top of our todo list. We're having a meeting today about upcoming priorities, and will follow up with you tomorrow with a timeline for the feature" Hard to beat that. Regards, Calvin Ellison Voice Services Engineer calvin.ellison at voxox.com +1 (213) 285-0555 ----------------------------------------------- voxox.com 9276 Scranton Rd, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor.
Kidd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Is anyone clustering VoIPMonitor? Geographically diverse networks with probes reporting up to a single front end? --------------------------- Brian J Murray -----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Calvin Ellison Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 1:33 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor Jumping on the VoIPmonitor bandwagon here; they've been more responsive than the average vendor to new feature requests. A memorable interaction went something like this: Voxox: "We'd like voipmon to do X." (e.g. process RTCP-XR and SIP PUBLISH reports from Polycom, or analyze a proprietary codec) VoIPMon: "We've had that on our roadmap for a while. Now that a customer (you) has requested X it will be moved to the top of our todo list. We're having a meeting today about upcoming priorities, and will follow up with you tomorrow with a timeline for the feature" Hard to beat that. Regards, Calvin Ellison Voice Services Engineer calvin.ellison at voxox.com +1 (213) 285-0555 ----------------------------------------------- voxox.com 9276 Scranton Rd, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor.
Kidd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
We have multiple probes on the east coast and west coast, reporting to a front end server. Works great! Sean Salvadalena | Network Engineer -----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Brian Murray Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 1:01 PM To: Calvin Ellison <calvin.ellison at voxox.com>; voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor Is anyone clustering VoIPMonitor? Geographically diverse networks with probes reporting up to a single front end? --------------------------- Brian J Murray -----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Calvin Ellison Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 1:33 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor Jumping on the VoIPmonitor bandwagon here; they've been more responsive than the average vendor to new feature requests. A memorable interaction went something like this: Voxox: "We'd like voipmon to do X." (e.g. process RTCP-XR and SIP PUBLISH reports from Polycom, or analyze a proprietary codec) VoIPMon: "We've had that on our roadmap for a while. Now that a customer (you) has requested X it will be moved to the top of our todo list. We're having a meeting today about upcoming priorities, and will follow up with you tomorrow with a timeline for the feature" Hard to beat that. Regards, Calvin Ellison Voice Services Engineer calvin.ellison at voxox.com +1 (213) 285-0555 ----------------------------------------------- voxox.com 9276 Scranton Rd, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor.
Kidd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Yup! Remote probes solved a couple challenges: Not only enabling geographically diverse networks, but also removing the need for port mirroring/SPAN within a datacenter. Regards, Calvin Ellison Voice Services Engineer calvin.ellison at voxox.com +1 (213) 285-0555 ----------------------------------------------- voxox.com 9276 Scranton Rd, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Brian Murray <bmurray at transbeam.com> wrote:
Is anyone clustering VoIPMonitor? Geographically diverse networks with probes reporting up to a single front end?
--------------------------- Brian J Murray
-----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Calvin Ellison Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 1:33 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor
Jumping on the VoIPmonitor bandwagon here; they've been more responsive than the average vendor to new feature requests. A memorable interaction went something like this:
Voxox: "We'd like voipmon to do X." (e.g. process RTCP-XR and SIP PUBLISH reports from Polycom, or analyze a proprietary codec)
VoIPMon: "We've had that on our roadmap for a while. Now that a customer (you) has requested X it will be moved to the top of our todo list. We're having a meeting today about upcoming priorities, and will follow up with you tomorrow with a timeline for the feature"
Hard to beat that.
Regards,
Calvin Ellison Voice Services Engineer calvin.ellison at voxox.com +1 (213) 285-0555
----------------------------------------------- voxox.com 9276 Scranton Rd, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor.
Kidd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
On 20 Nov 2015 21:15, "Calvin Ellison" <calvin.ellison at voxox.com> wrote:
Yup! Remote probes solved a couple challenges: Not only enabling geographically diverse networks, but also removing the need for port mirroring/SPAN within a datacenter.
Does anyone put anything at the CPE side for testing links? We're a Homer 5 user at the moment.
Anyone have a sales contact at voipmonitor they can share or should I just go through their webpage? Feel free to reply on or off-list. Thanks, Pete On Nov 20, 2015, at 16:33, Gavin Henry <ghenry at suretec.co.uk> wrote: On 20 Nov 2015 21:15, "Calvin Ellison" <calvin.ellison at voxox.com> wrote:
Yup! Remote probes solved a couple challenges: Not only enabling geographically diverse networks, but also removing the need for port mirroring/SPAN within a datacenter.
Does anyone put anything at the CPE side for testing links? We're a Homer 5 user at the moment. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
Just email info at voipmonitor.org<mailto:info at voipmonitor.org>. Martin will respond quickly. Geoff Mina President & CIO Connect First, Inc. 720.335.5924<tel:720.335.5924> Website<http://www.connectfirst.com/> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoffmina> | Email<mailto:gmina at connectfirst.com> On Nov 20, 2015, at 6:28 PM, Peter E <peeip989 at gmail.com<mailto:peeip989 at gmail.com>> wrote: Anyone have a sales contact at voipmonitor they can share or should I just go through their webpage? Feel free to reply on or off-list. Thanks, Pete On Nov 20, 2015, at 16:33, Gavin Henry <ghenry at suretec.co.uk<mailto:ghenry at suretec.co.uk>> wrote: On 20 Nov 2015 21:15, "Calvin Ellison" <calvin.ellison at voxox.com<mailto:calvin.ellison at voxox.com>> wrote:
Yup! Remote probes solved a couple challenges: Not only enabling geographically diverse networks, but also removing the need for port mirroring/SPAN within a datacenter.
Does anyone put anything at the CPE side for testing links? We're a Homer 5 user at the moment. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
So based on everything I am getting from this thread, VoIPMonitor seems to be the way to go. I have not heard too much about homer. We are evaluating wholesale hosted PBX providers. One has VoIPMonitor integrated into their platform, and the other has Homer built into their platform. Trying to understand if I am at a disadvantage going with the platform that includes homer. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> wrote:
I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor.
Kidd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent
Cheers, Daniel
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
Any talk about VoIP monitory doing H.248 and/or NCS? Frank From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 7:36 AM To: Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com> Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Homer vs VoIPMonitor So based on everything I am getting from this thread, VoIPMonitor seems to be the way to go. I have not heard too much about homer. We are evaluating wholesale hosted PBX providers. One has VoIPMonitor integrated into their platform, and the other has Homer built into their platform. Trying to understand if I am at a disadvantage going with the platform that includes homer. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Kidd Filby <kiddfilby at gmail.com <mailto:kiddfilby at gmail.com> > wrote: I have had experience with Empirix, Palladian and VoIPMonitor. Both Empirix and Palladian are EXPENSIVE and very hard to Engineer correctly to capture all the messaging. An under-engineered system will be VERY annoying and a HUGE waste of money. VoIPMonitor has been extremely valuable, very easy to use, simple to integrate, cost effective and plain old accurate. For the options available today, I wouldn't go with anything other than VoIPMonitor. Kidd On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com> > wrote: On 20/11/15 14:22, Colton Conor wrote:
I believe you are correct that Homer only does SIP, where VoIPMonitor does both. The latest version of homer capture agent can track rtcp:
https://github.com/sipcapture/captagent Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 30-Dec 2, Berlin - http://asipto.com/kat _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops -- Kidd Filby 661.557.5640 <tel:661.557.5640> (C) http://www.linkedin.com/in/kiddfilby
Pcapture, which is the commercial version of Homer, is also an excellent option. Cheers, Brad On Nov 19, 2015 5:06 PM, "Colton Conor" <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:
What are the differences between these two applications? I know homer is free and opensource, and VoIPMonitor is a paid application. Besides that what is the difference? Is there anything else out there for monitoring VoIP?
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
participants (14)
-
bmurray＠transbeam.com -
brad.anouar＠masergy.com -
calvin.ellison＠voxox.com -
colton.conor＠gmail.com -
frnkblk＠iname.com -
ghenry＠suretec.co.uk -
gmina＠connectfirst.com -
jaybinks＠gmail.com -
jjessico＠gmail.com -
kiddfilby＠gmail.com -
miconda＠gmail.com -
peeip989＠gmail.com -
sean＠telnes.com -
shripald＠gmail.com