Acme SBC geographic redundancy
Brandon, Have you talked to your Metaswitch se they are now fully supporting the acme with the Metaswitch so you don't have to be dealing with 2 different groups pointing the finger at each other saying it's there fault. We purchased the acme directly thru meta so we didn't have to deal with so many parties. Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 F: 650.649.3551 From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Buckner Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:57 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] Acme SBC geographic redundancy Is anyone doing geographic redundancy with their Acme Packet SBCs? We've got an HA pair of nn4250s right now and are installing a new Metaswitch system that is geographically redundant at two locations with external call agents, TDM links, etc. We'd like to get SIP to be the same. I'm still waiting on a response from our Acme SE about it but wanted to see what others had done, if anything. I figure some discussion will spark questions I can bring up with Acme as well. Thanks, ---- Brandon Buckner Switching Technician / VoIP Admin Iowa Network Services brandonb at netins.com
We purchased our AcmePackets through MetaSwitch also. one-stop-shopping makes support much less of a headache! akabis_logo_small Mark Wiles, Vice President of Engineering 866-312-1070 ext. 1003 336-358-5550 direct 336-989-4895 cellular 336-358-5551 fax This email and its attachments may contain information or documentation ("Confidential Information") that is confidential and proprietary to Akabis, LLC. Your reading of this email and/or the attachments constitutes your acknowledgement and agreement that, except pursuant to a written agreement with Akabis, LLC, (i) the Confidential Information is the exclusive property of Akabis, LLC, (ii) you will not share the Confidential Information with any unauthorized party and/or (iii) you will not use the Confidential Information for your own benefit or the benefit of any third party. From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Alcantar Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:29 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Acme SBC geographic redundancy Brandon, Have you talked to your Metaswitch se they are now fully supporting the acme with the Metaswitch so you don't have to be dealing with 2 different groups pointing the finger at each other saying it's there fault. We purchased the acme directly thru meta so we didn't have to deal with so many parties. Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 F: 650.649.3551 From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Buckner Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:57 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] Acme SBC geographic redundancy Is anyone doing geographic redundancy with their Acme Packet SBCs? We've got an HA pair of nn4250s right now and are installing a new Metaswitch system that is geographically redundant at two locations with external call agents, TDM links, etc. We'd like to get SIP to be the same. I'm still waiting on a response from our Acme SE about it but wanted to see what others had done, if anything. I figure some discussion will spark questions I can bring up with Acme as well. Thanks, ---- Brandon Buckner Switching Technician / VoIP Admin Iowa Network Services brandonb at netins.com
participants (2)
-
carlos＠race.com -
mwiles＠akabis.com