Arbitration or Peering?

This blog post from Transnexus highlights a filing Inteliquent placed with the FCC about an Arbitrage Scheme. https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/ The link is broken to the original filing so I can't read the full details. Maybe I'm not understanding the full complaint, but Inteliquent is expecting a lot of traffic to come through them to the IPES's number ranges but they aren't getting the traffic. The "Wholesale Inbound Provider" instead is getting the traffic. Wouldn't this just be similar to private peering between providers? I've had "10 Digit peering" service before from a vendor but that product went away a few years ago. ~Jared

Not sure if this is related or not, but I have been receiving an increase in complaints of calls not getting to my subscribers. The originators says they get ringing forever, ring a couple times then a tone and silence, and other such non-sense.? This is typical rural call completion issues. Inteliquent handles all of my toll calls, inbound and outbound. In almost every case the originator is a VoIP provider that has no physical presence in my LATA.? Inteliquent says they have no record of the call.? Of course they don't, I already assumed that, but I sometimes check with Inteliquent anyways. I serve mostly rural portions of Northwest Minnesota. The frequency of these complaints wax and wane over time.? Point being, I feel there has been a significant increase over the past several months.

I just read over the blog and I am not understanding how the money is being made here via ?exorbitant access fees to terminate calls?. I fully understand the old way though. Can IPES providers dictate what people pay for them terminating a call from the wholesale provider? What part of the puzzle am I also missing that allows a money making scheme from inbound calls being generated by a bad actor? I feel like the ?hosting lec end office? is the same scummy LECs that were doing it in the past. They must be using the IPES as a way to avoid the local/access tandems to keep the high billing going?!? Matt From: VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> On Behalf Of Jared Geiger Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 3:47 PM To: VoiceOps <voiceops at voiceops.org> Subject: [VoiceOps] Arbitration or Peering? This blog post from Transnexus highlights a filing Inteliquent placed with the FCC about an Arbitrage Scheme. https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/ The link is broken to the original filing so I can't read the full details. Maybe I'm not understanding the full complaint, but Inteliquent is expecting a lot of traffic to come through them to the IPES's number ranges but they aren't getting the traffic. The "Wholesale Inbound Provider" instead is getting the traffic. Wouldn't this just be similar to private peering between providers? I've had "10 Digit peering" service before from a vendor but that product went away a few years ago. ~Jared

Jared- Maybe this case ? ? https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-373349A1.pdf seems to be pending / working its way through. "Since 2011, the Commission has taken numerous actions to modernize this outdated system and curb the harmful arbitrage that it invites." -Jeff Quoting Jared Geiger <compuwizz at gmail.com>:
This blog post from Transnexus highlights a filing Inteliquent placed with the FCC about an Arbitrage Scheme.?https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/ ? The link is broken to the original filing so I can't read the full details. ? Maybe I'm not understanding the full complaint, but Inteliquent is expecting a lot of traffic to come through them to the IPES's number ranges but they aren't getting the traffic. The "Wholesale Inbound Provider" instead is getting the traffic. ? Wouldn't this just be similar to private peering between providers? I've had "10 Digit peering" service before from a vendor but that product went away a few years ago. ? ~Jared ?

Thanks Jeff, Thats probably the case referenced in the blog. Looks like the complaint is over Toll Free compensation which I thought was pretty much going away anyway. On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:16 PM Jeff Brower <jbrower at signalogic.com> wrote:
Jared-
Maybe this case ?
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-373349A1.pdf
seems to be pending / working its way through.
"Since 2011, the Commission has taken numerous actions to modernize this outdated system and curb the harmful arbitrage that it invites."
-Jeff
Quoting Jared Geiger <compuwizz at gmail.com>:
This blog post from Transnexus highlights a filing Inteliquent placed with the FCC about an Arbitrage Scheme. https://transnexus.com/blog/2022/access-arbitrage-rules-discussion/
The link is broken to the original filing so I can't read the full details.
Maybe I'm not understanding the full complaint, but Inteliquent is expecting a lot of traffic to come through them to the IPES's number ranges but they aren't getting the traffic. The "Wholesale Inbound Provider" instead is getting the traffic.
Wouldn't this just be similar to private peering between providers? I've had "10 Digit peering" service before from a vendor but that product went away a few years ago.
~Jared
participants (4)
-
compuwizz@gmail.com
-
jbrower@signalogic.com
-
mjohnston@wiktel.com
-
myaklin@firstlight.net