- VoiceOps - lists.voiceops.org

T.38 work
by David_Hiers＠adp.com May 6, 2011

May 6, 2011

Hi, At SIPNOC I found out that SIP Forum has a pretty big project going to get FOIP/T.38 fixed once and for all. http://www.sipforum.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,4… If you have some cycles to bring to bear on the fax issue, you might want to drop Mike Coffee a note (email in the pdf). Thanks, David Hiers CCIE (R/S, V), CISSP ADP Dealer Services 2525 SW 1st Ave. Suite 300W Portland, OR 97201 o: 503-205-4467 f: 503-402-3277 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.

1 0

Massive outage?
by d＠d-man.org May 6, 2011

May 6, 2011

Well I rarely report outages to the list, but we can't get any traffic via any of our carriers right now. They're all responding to our SIP messages but can't seem to get any circuits going ? things are just timing out. Also, can't reach www.he.net. Anyone else have any interesting fun going on? Darren Schreiber CEO / Co-Founder 2600hz | www.2600hz.com<http://www.2600hz.com/> sip:darren at 2600hz.com tel:415-886-7901

2 2

CLID/CNAM
by avorlando＠yahoo.com May 6, 2011

May 6, 2011

All Trying to dig back to pstn days but can't quite remember. If I have an unlisted number what should I do with CLID and CNAM? I seem to recall delivering both and that if the sub wanted blocking of CLID they had to enable that feature but they were not tied together. If it's unlisted do we update lidb with unlisted? Please help

2 1

Massive outage - nevermind :-)
by d＠d-man.org May 6, 2011

May 6, 2011

OK so it seems localized afterall, to California numbers hosted in www.he.net land by various providers. Ignore my previous note. Darren Schreiber CEO / Co-Founder 2600hz | www.2600hz.com<http://www.2600hz.com/> sip:darren at 2600hz.com tel:415-886-7901

1 0

verizon wholesale outage
by lunchhound9999＠gmail.com May 2, 2011

May 2, 2011

Did anyone else lose access to some of their verizon wholesale proxies over the weekend? We got nailed with a bunch of flaps....

1 0

Looking ss7 traces for LNP query.
by clecny＠gmail.com May 2, 2011

May 2, 2011

Hi, I am looking for sample ss7 traces for LNP query. it can be sigtran ( pcap) file , simple text decoded ss7 message or any other format . I just need MTP3+SCCP+TCAP+ AIN 0.2 query and response for my reference. Thanks, Jay.

1 0

SMS enabled DIDs
by clec＠cygnustel.com May 2, 2011

May 2, 2011

We are a CLEC and have SS7 trunks. From my limited understanding, SMS rides over ISUP, so in theory we would simply have an entry in an SMS DB that says all our SMS messages should be sent to a particular point code correct? Do I have this at all right, and if so, how do I enter this SMS DB point code information? Thanks! -Eric

7 9

trouble terminating to 203-546?
by David_Hiers＠adp.com April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

Is anyone having trouble getting calls into the 203-546 exchange? David Hiers CCIE (R/S, V), CISSP ADP Dealer Services 2525 SW 1st Ave. Suite 300W Portland, OR 97201 o: 503-205-4467 f: 503-402-3277 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.

2 1

Airespring SIP issues
by ndattilo＠rgts.com April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

Anyone having an issue receiving SIP DID's from Airespring? We are getting fast busies and upon calling them they started getting flooded with calls

1 0

efax port out
by carlos＠televolve.com April 27, 2011

April 27, 2011

I haven't paid close attention, but I think they are now with the integration of Gizmo5. Before that they were just a forwarding service, no? -- Sent from my iPad On Apr 26, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Eric Fort <eric.fort at gmail.com> wrote: Is google voice NOT an interconnected VoIP carrier? I certainly use it to make and receive PSTN calls. They also have a procedure to port in, just no mention as to how one would port out, but the porting rules in both directions should apply as Google voice seems to me to meet it definition of an interconnected VoIP carrier. Eric Fort Fort Consulting On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Carlos Alvarez <carlos at televolve.com>wrote: > They are an ITSP, and the FCC ruling trumps the contract. What I'm saying > is that there is nothing clear on these non-carrier services, so the > contract still has weight. It's clear that Efax and the others are not > ITSPs. Last I heard you couldn't port from Google Voice, and they are big > enough to make this an issue. > > > > Paul Timmins wrote: > >> VoicePulse had similar language in their contracts, and it didn't do a >> thing for them. >> >> On 04/26/2011 11:45 AM, Carlos Alvarez wrote: >> >>> Here's an additional complication I forgot to mention: These services >>> all seem to include "you can't port" into their TOS. At least Efax and >>> Answer Phoenix, the two I researched, do. So not only is our position >>> with the FCC tenuous at best, the customer effectively signed a >>> contract acknowledging that they don't own the numbers. >>> >>> >>> Justin B Newman wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Eric Hiller<clec at cygnustel.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So what should the next step be, go back to XO and say all of this >>>>> to them >>>>> and see if they budge? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Good luck. The last time I tried this, XO (and the provider) asserted: >>>> >>>> - Information Service >>>> - Person asserting end-user status not customer of record >>>> >>>> The FCC indicated that to pursue the complaint a fee would be required >>>> - and it wasn't worth it to anyone involved. >>>> >>>> -jbn >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Carlos Alvarez > TelEvolve > 602-889-3003 > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps at voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >

2 1