- VoiceOps - lists.voiceops.org

Contacting Carriers and CLECs (Specifically T-Mobile today)
by scott＠sberkman.net Dec. 2, 2009

Dec. 2, 2009

Does anyone know of a centralized list or standard method of reaching other CLECs and Carriers, specifically Cell Carriers? Something similar to Puck's NOC list (http://puck.nether.net/netops/) is what I am thinking of. We are having some routing issues to certain numbers we own from T-Mobile and are having issues reaching the right type of support staff, especially since you can't even get their regular support without an account. Thanks, -Scott

6 6

Contacting Carriers and CLECs (Specifically T-Mobiletoday)
by carlos＠race.com Dec. 1, 2009

Dec. 1, 2009

Look the numbers up in the lerg telcordia is pretty good at keeping all that info up to date. From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Scott Berkman Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:42 AM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] Contacting Carriers and CLECs (Specifically T-Mobiletoday) Does anyone know of a centralized list or standard method of reaching other CLECs and Carriers, specifically Cell Carriers? Something similar to Puck's NOC list (http://puck.nether.net/netops/) is what I am thinking of. We are having some routing issues to certain numbers we own from T-Mobile and are having issues reaching the right type of support staff, especially since you can't even get their regular support without an account. Thanks, -Scott

1 0

OT: Payment bureau
by abalashov＠evaristesys.com Dec. 1, 2009

Dec. 1, 2009

Greetings, I'm not sure if this is within the purview of the list or not, but I would like to get everyone's thoughts on the creation of something like a "credit bureau" specific to our industry. I don't think we currently have anything like that in the VoIP cottage industry, unless I am mistaken. Simply put, we should have a way of anonymously rating customers' payment history and noting any especially egregious disputes. Access should be restricted only to verified companies legitimately engaged in VoIP-related trade. My interest in this is from a consulting and professional services angle, since that's what Evariste Systems does. However, I do not see why this could not also accommodate payment information from the ITSP and small carrier world. There are lots of potential problems, of course: 1) Some customers would consider disclosure of any transactional information a violation of standing NDAs; 2) The possibility of clutter from small/irrelevant transactions, like $5 prepayments for O/T or calling cards; 3) Some need for moderation and standards enforcement; there is a very real possibility of abuse by members by leveraging such a tool in frivolous business disputes, or business disputes in which their hands are not clean any more than the customer's; example: I could fail to deliver to a customer what I promised, and then report his refusal to pay as a financial misdeed; 4) Large deals and transactions often already go through credit checks with real credit bureaus and various ratings firms. Nevertheless, I think there would be a lot of value as well. And while there is the possibility that the existence of such a tool could be used to intimidate/threaten customers in business disputes, the value of catching fraudsters who go around from VoIP company to VoIP company ripping each one off and disappearing into a hole might outweigh that. My father does, among other things, some freelance translation. In that industry, there's a web site called: http://www.paymentpractices.net/ It is upon seeing this that I wondered why we do not have something like that in our world. Eager to hear your thoughts, -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671

3 4

CCI call termination
by BrandonB＠netins.com Nov. 30, 2009

Nov. 30, 2009

Anyone use or have any thoughts on CCI for toll and international SIP-to-PSTN termination? I don't recall seeing them listed in any of the previous threads on the subject. Thanks, ---- Brandon Buckner Switching Technician / VoIP Admin Iowa Network Services brandonb at netins.com<mailto:brandonb at netins.com>

3 4

Comcast Voice Contact
by lists＠iamchriswallace.com Nov. 30, 2009

Nov. 30, 2009

Does anyone on the list have a contact for Comcast's NOC, particularly their voice NOC? ---Chris

1 0

VoiceOps Digest, Vol 5, Issue 40
by jpuckett＠e-c-group.com Nov. 26, 2009

Nov. 26, 2009

Make sure that your MM/IOM are not in the same vlan as any of your blades.

1 0

Issue with Cisco Catalyst Switch in IBM Blade Center
by ujjval＠simplesignal.com Nov. 25, 2009

Nov. 25, 2009

Hi All: Have you seen issues with Cisco Catalyst Switch in the IBM Blade Center that causes all the other Cards in the Blade Center to be partially responsive. All the Servers were responding to pings 50% of the time with some pings getting back invalid responses like the one below: 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.506 ms wrong data byte #32 should be 0x20 but was 0xc0 #8 8 9 a b c d e f 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f c0 9 80 d 29 25 26 27 #40 28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Ujjval Karihaloo VP Voice Engineering IP Phone: +13032428610 E-Fax: +17202391690 SimpleSignal Inc. 88 Inverness Circle East Suite K105 Englewood, CO 80112 [cid:image001.jpg at 01CA6DC4.1A438290]<http://www.simplesignal.com/>

2 4

Probably OT Ports for Broadsoft
by mylists＠battleop.com Nov. 23, 2009

Nov. 23, 2009

Please forgive me if this is off topic but I am striking out on the Google lottery. Can someone point me to where I could find what ports a phone connected to a Broadsoft switch would use? I am guessing 5060-5080 and 10000-20000 but not having worked with a Broadsoft switch I don't know for sure. Richey

3 3

Cisco SBC - feedback ?
by benc＠brennanit.com.au Nov. 23, 2009

Nov. 23, 2009

Greeting, I recently came across Cisco's offering for a SBC -> The 'ACE20-SBC-K9' http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/install_config/sbc_config_guid… I was Curious who out there uses this and what their thoughts on the product was or any feedback for that matter on it. Up until recently we were heading down the Acme Packet path, however most of our Current infrastructure is Cisco, so it kinda of makes sense to take a serious look at this. Cheers. Ben Cornish National Network Manager Direct 07 3234 9302 Direct: 02 8235 3520 Mobile 0417 617 204 Email mailto:benc at brennanit.com.au Web http://www.brennanit.com.au/ http://www.brennanit.com.au/

4 4

Yate B2BUA as media gateway controller
by abalashov＠evaristesys.com Nov. 17, 2009

Nov. 17, 2009

The release notes of Yate 2.1 (released 02 November 2009) contain what struck me initially as a somewhat extraordinary claim - that its new MTP2/MTP3 support combined with MGCP can be used as a drop-in replacement for a Cisco PGW2200 to drive Cisco AS5xxx series gateways. At first glance, this does appear to be possible. Does anyone have any experience or first-hand perspective on this? Of course, the media gateway control protocol is limited to MGCP - there is no H.248/MEGACO support. Thanks, -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671

1 0