- VoiceOps - lists.voiceops.org

genband SBC 7.1 question
by zavoid＠gmail.com April 25, 2012

April 25, 2012

Does anyone know how to disable or turnoff support for RFC 3326 sip REASON headers in version 7.1 of genband SBC's.. either on a per trunk or global setting. I want to make sure those HEADERS are not inserted into the SIP response messages sent since they are basically useless and I have a customer who is acting on them instead of the SIP responses. Thanks, Colin

1 1

question about fios
by shripald＠gmail.com April 20, 2012

April 20, 2012

hey all, another ITSP happened to mention to me that Verizon FIOS services were having one-way audio issues yesterday. Since most of our customers connect privately back to our network. i didn't think much of it, however, we do have a couple of clients coming to us publicly via fios. they are experiencing the same the issue right now. Has anyone heard or experienced anything with regard to this issue? thanks, shri

3 4

Broadsoft Call recording
by RDawson＠alliedtelecom.net April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

Wanted to get a feel for what platforms, commercial or open source/custom, everyone is using for user initiated call recording. Thanks, Rob

1 0

NV/NY CLECs
by justin＠ejtown.org April 18, 2012

April 18, 2012

Good Morning: I'm looking for a small CLEC (or two) to partner with, who have existing facilities in New York and/or Nevada. (In this case, you need your own interconnection agreement, native local numbers, and your own trunks to the local tandems). If there is anyone out there that fits the bill, please drop me a line off-list, and we can discuss in more depth what we have in mind. Yours, -jbn Justin B Newman

1 0

Siemens HiQ 8000 question
by zavoid＠gmail.com April 17, 2012

April 17, 2012

Does anyone have any experience with the Siemens HiQ 8000 series? I've got a customer with one of these hunks of junk that is sending a BYE instead of a CANCEL in this situation below: 1.1.1.1 ---INVITE---> 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 <--TRYING-- 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 <--183 SP-- 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 --BYE---> 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 <--200ok- 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 --CANCEL-> 2.2.2.2 1.1.1.1 <-487 expected back-- 2.2.2.2 While I understand that a BYE is legal according to the RFC 3261 it really breaks with the spirit of it and interoperability. Does anyone know how to configure the Siemens HiQ 8000 to send a CANCEL instead of the BYE in this situation like any normal SBC would? THanks, Colin

1 0

new verizon gateways
by David.Hiers＠adp.com April 13, 2012

April 13, 2012

Is everyone ready for the new Verizon gateways coming on line next week? David Hiers This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.

1 0

using agile for service delivery
by acowan＠leonidsystems.com April 13, 2012

April 13, 2012

If you're involved in CPE testing or product/service design, you might be interested in a paper on the application of agile user stories to enterprise telephony: http://www.leonidsystems.com/publications/story-driven-service-design-an-in… If you're not familiar, agile is a development methodology popular out here in Silicon Valley with software companies but you can apply it to a lot of things; service delivery is certainly one of them. We're always learning how to better apply the ideas, so please post here or write to acowan at leonidsystems.com if you're at all inclined. Alex Alex Cowan Leonid Systems 415-483-4529 acowan at leonidsystems.com

1 0

response code mapping to upstream peers
by hiersd＠gmail.com April 11, 2012

April 11, 2012

Hi, Does anyone do any response code mapping on the peer side? You can deny information to attackers by changing you codes from the default (turn a BUSY HERE into a BAD GATEWAY, at the SBC, for instance), and I'm wondering if anyone has found a good reason to do so. Thanks, David

4 5

Playback of a G.722 RTP stream
by abaird＠telesphere.com April 11, 2012

April 11, 2012

Does anyone know of a way to capture and playback a g722 rtp stream? I'd prefer to be able to use wireshark and some sort of decoder tool, much like the decoder I use for g729. In fact the company that makes the g729 decoder (http://www.voiceage.com/freecodecs.php) has a decoder for g722.1 and g722.2 but not g722 itself. Are there any tools (free or otherwise) out there that you've seen that will decode a g722 stream for playback? Thanks ADAM BAIRD | SR. VOICE ENGINEER Anywhere (480) 289-7476 | Fax (480) 289-7477 | abaird at telesphere.com<mailto:abaird at telesphere.com> Telesphere | 9237 E. Via de Ventura, Ste 250 | Scottsdale, AZ 85258<http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&q=9237%20E.%20Via%20de%20Ventura,%20Ste%202…> [cid:image001.jpg at 01CD17DB.90889800]<http://www.telesphere.com/advanced_features.html> [cid:image002.jpg at 01CD17DB.90889800]<http://www.telesphere.com/> [cid:image003.png at 01CD17DB.90889800]<http://www.facebook.com/telesphere> [cid:image004.png at 01CD17DB.90889800]<http://www.twitter.com/telesphere> [cid:image005.png at 01CD17DB.90889800]<http://www.linkedin.com/companies/telesphere> [cid:image006.png at 01CD17DB.90889800]<http://www.youtube.com/user/telesphere> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Telesphere.

3 2

Broadworks Shared Call Appearance
by telephonetoughguy83＠gmail.com April 11, 2012

April 11, 2012

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Andy Smith <telephonetoughguy83 at gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks to everyone for the info. I was misunderstanding a few things, but > I've got it straightened out now. > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Michael Bain <mike at mostly-harmless.ca>wrote: > >> You should just need to use the %BWLINEPORT-2%, %BWAUTHPASSWORD-2% >> equivalents for the second line (and %BWLINEPORT-3% for the third, etc). >> The Shared Line tag works the same way. You should be able to use >> %BWSHAREDLINE-1%, %BWSHAREDLINE-2%, .... >> >> Mike >> >> On 10 April 2012 13:33, Andy Smith <telephonetoughguy83 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Does anyone have experience using Broadworks Shared Call Appearance on a >>> Polycom Soundpoint IP phone? I can make it work by manually editing the >>> Polycom config file, but I can't figure out how to automate the process. >>> For example, Line 1 on my phone will be my normal private line. The >>> template config file has Broadworks system variables such as, >>> %BWLINEPORT-1%, %BWAUTHPASSWORD-1%, etc. that automatically populate >>> certain fields. I want Line 2 to be a shared call appearance line. Under >>> "reg.2.type" in the config file, I'm using the system variable >>> %BWSHAREDLINE% to change the line from "private" to "shared", but I can't >>> seem to find any variables for populating the User ID, extension, >>> authentication password, etc. for the second line. How do I populate the >>> correct information in for Line 2? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> VoiceOps mailing list >>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>> >>> >> >

1 0