- VoiceOps - lists.voiceops.org

Acme STUN
by TParkin＠nuvox.com Sept. 29, 2009

Sept. 29, 2009

Has anybody used the STUN functionality of the Acme SD? I posed the following questions to our SE and engineer, but if anybody has actual experience with it I'd be curious to know how it works. -Does it work? J -Re: performance, is STUN less costly than a very short registration refresh rate (<30 seconds)? Some impact on performance of a fully loaded SD 4000 would be appreciated. -Is it a better solution than their hosted NAT traversal? Thanks, Tyler This email and any attachments ("Message") may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the addressee, or if this Message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy, or distribute it, and we ask that you please delete it (including all copies) and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this Message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) shall not be deemed a waiver of confidentiality and/or a privilege.

5 7

Acme Packet available
by abrahamaabj＠yahoo.com Sept. 24, 2009

Sept. 24, 2009

I have 2 Acme Packet NNSDQ-SHI-3-G2P2-A net-net session directors. There were 32,000 sessions. They are expired. If interested please email me at Abe at launch3.net.

1 0

Offtopic (SBC recommendations)
by sil＠infiltrated.net Sept. 23, 2009

Sept. 23, 2009

Hey all, (I'm sure for those who I criss-cross lists with - you've seen it before)... We're definitely looking to replace our outgoing Nutrakes (pre-audiocodes assimilation) and we've been looking at a few. While I will say I'm impressed with Acme and Covergence (which is now Acme anyway), anyone care to either off or on list comment about others you've had success with. Any particular one with perhaps a pre-paid system/spinoff/module/compartment/* (don't ask) is a plus. Keep in mind, the less interops (big 4, VZ, GLBX, L3, AT&T) we can do, the better! (hooray for less work on the plates). So far, as stated, I personally liked Covergence's offering as have I Acme, haven't looked at Sonus yet, but was wondering what else are we (myself and colleagues) missing. Newport Networks is pretty much gone the puppets.com, socks.com, VirtualAvenue, Xoom route of the dinosaur. So without further a rambling... Suggestions. -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E

14 17

Cisco Gateways, REFER and TBCT/ECT
by jnesheim＠cytek.biz Sept. 19, 2009

Sept. 19, 2009

Cisco gateways do support TBCT in when the ISDN PRI is configured in user mode. This requires TBCT support on the network switch you're connecting it to. You'll also need to enable the TBCT supplementary service feature on the Serial interface in the router. For example: lab-cisco1(config)#int ser0/0/1:23 lab-cisco1(config-if)#isdn supp-service tbct ? notify-on-clear subscribed to get notification on transfered call clear tbct-with-crflg tbct req with cr flg <cr> When the router receives a REFER on the SIP side for an existing call it will initiate a TBCT remote operation on the PRI to the switch. If the switch supports it, the call will be transferred. -- Jason Nesheim ----- Original Message ----- From: "RJ Auburn" <rj at voxeo.com> To: voiceops at voiceops.org Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 5:46:25 PM Subject: [VoiceOps] Cisco Gateways, REFER and TBCT/ECT Folks, Has anyone had any luck getting the Cisco VoIP gateways to do a TBCT or ECT when they receive a REFER message for a SIP call? In theory there is a way to do this in TCL script but I have never been able to get anyone at Cisco who knew how to actually configure it or make it work. For what it's worth AudioCodes supports this out the box in an extremely painless manner. As close to plug and play as you can get in TDM land. Hopefully someone out here on this list has gotten it working on a Cisco and can lend a hand. Thanks, RJ --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800 _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

1 0

3NG Networks
by axios.misos＠gmail.com Sept. 18, 2009

Sept. 18, 2009

Hello all, outside of the obvious nslookup, whois, website "custom tailored" information available, has anyone had any dealings with 3NG Networks or Telemedium or IVI Communications. Off-list reponses welcomed

1 0

Cisco Gateways, REFER and TBCT/ECT
by rj＠voxeo.com Sept. 17, 2009

Sept. 17, 2009

Folks, Has anyone had any luck getting the Cisco VoIP gateways to do a TBCT or ECT when they receive a REFER message for a SIP call? In theory there is a way to do this in TCL script but I have never been able to get anyone at Cisco who knew how to actually configure it or make it work. For what it's worth AudioCodes supports this out the box in an extremely painless manner. As close to plug and play as you can get in TDM land. Hopefully someone out here on this list has gotten it working on a Cisco and can lend a hand. Thanks, RJ --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800

1 0

What to look for in a SIP Trunking concept?
by Guy.Ram＠t-systems.com Sept. 17, 2009

Sept. 17, 2009

Trying to develop an Enterprise SIP trunking concept that allows us the flexibility to interconnect with the major PBX vendors on one side and SIP trunking providers on the other side. Looking at ACMEPACKET as the Integrator SBC box for this concept. One thought was to ask the PBX vendors and Service Provider if they have adopted the SIP Connect 1.1 standard? I'm not a voice expert so would really appreciate any comments and /or suggestions on what we need to be weary of from each party as we develop this concept, especially with regard to regulatory obligations. Thanks, -guy

7 8

CPE IAD recommendations
by eseifer＠comcast.net Sept. 17, 2009

Sept. 17, 2009

Hello, Can anyone recommend a small market Integrated Access Device (IAD) that is capable of being a SIP Trunk endpoint with Broadsoft? I have a few points of criteria that we are looking at: 1. Supports up to 8 FXS ports. 2. Compatible with keyed-system PBX's. 3. Prefer a manufacturer with a strong, responsive support team. 4. Price: around $500. Thanks, Eric

14 20

Least Cost Routing engines/solutions
by ssrinivasan＠telesphere.com Sept. 17, 2009

Sept. 17, 2009

Folks, I am looking for recommendations for solutions to implement an LCR engine in my network. I am BroadSoft based service provider that leverages the routing capabilities in that platform but that does not seem like it is designed for LCR use. I am open to open source implementations as well. At this point I am not restricting my search from a budget perspective - I just want to see what is out there and what others have done. Fundamentally I need to be able to set up LC routes based on originating/terminating numbers (NPA should suffice) Thanks SANJAY SRINIVASAN 480.385.7062 (Anywhere) | 480.385.7064 (fax) | ssinivasan at telesphere.com<mailto:ssrinivasan at telesphere.com> | www.telesphere.com<http://www.telesphere.com/> 9237 E. Via de Ventura | Suite 250 | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 [cid:image001.jpg at 01CA36E0.EDF26360]

4 3

ipv6 is for real (was Re: CPE IAD recommendations)
by jsahala＠gmail.com Sept. 16, 2009

Sept. 16, 2009

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Kenny Sallee <kenny.sallee at gmail.com> wrote: [cut] > This is a little off topic but...Are any ISP's using IPv6 for connectivity > with their customers?? ?What application are you all looking to use it for > (internal or external use)? ?I know it's needed and understand IP addressing > and issues with v4 and v6. ?Just?trying to gauge if this is a lab project > you are talking about or if ipv6 is starting to be used in the 'real-world' yes, ipv6 is real and available, even from u.s. isps (who are about a decade behind most european providers). comcast is also rolling it out to cable subscribers in certain markets. google is available over v6, yahoo should have some of their stuff on v6 too. sadly voice softswitch vendors are lagging way behind in ipv6 (some are barely up to 1990s technologies/standards in ipv4, so i'm not terribly surprised). a lot of "enterprise" cisco kit is barely v6 capable as well... so in terms of viability of using v6 for voip interconnection, it will be a few years /joshua -- A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. - Douglas Adams -

5 6