- VoiceOps - lists.voiceops.org

Offtopic (SBC recommendations)
by carlos＠race.com Sept. 2, 2009

Sept. 2, 2009

I?m on the acme bandwagon as well just got it in monday sitting here next to my desk installing it next week. Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 x143 F: 650.649.3551 From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of anorexicpoodle Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:37 PM To: Junaid Hattia Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Offtopic (SBC recommendations) I'll jump in on the Acme bandwagon. Very happy with them. On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 23:13 +0200, Junaid Hattia wrote: Another for acme! We running 4250's and soon 4500's with no problems...*touch wood* On 2009/09/02 9:46 PM, "Mike Callahan" <mcallahan at bullseyetelecom.com> wrote: > +1 for Acme. Wish I was running them instead of NexTone's crap. > > -----Original Message----- > From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org > [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org]On Behalf Of J. Oquendo > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:42 PM > To: voiceops at voiceops.org > Subject: [VoiceOps] Offtopic (SBC recommendations) > > > > Hey all, (I'm sure for those who I criss-cross lists with - you've seen > it before)... > > We're definitely looking to replace our outgoing Nutrakes > (pre-audiocodes assimilation) and we've been looking at a few. While I > will say I'm impressed with Acme and Covergence (which is now Acme > anyway), anyone care to either off or on list comment about others > you've had success with. Any particular one with perhaps a pre-paid > system/spinoff/module/compartment/* (don't ask) is a plus. > > Keep in mind, the less interops (big 4, VZ, GLBX, L3, AT&T) we can do, > the better! (hooray for less work on the plates). > > So far, as stated, I personally liked Covergence's offering as have I > Acme, haven't looked at Sonus yet, but was wondering what else are we > (myself and colleagues) missing. Newport Networks is pretty much gone > the puppets.com, socks.com, VirtualAvenue, Xoom route of the dinosaur. > So without further a rambling... Suggestions. > > > -- > > =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ > J. Oquendo > SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP > > "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to > ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things > differently." - Warren Buffett > > 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps at voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps at voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confidentiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a mail to disclaimers at is.co.za and a copy will be emailed to you. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

2 1

LRN for VoIP
by jarrod＠fed-com.com Sept. 2, 2009

Sept. 2, 2009

Does anyone here have any recommendation for a reliable VoIP LRN provider other than Neustar and or Synniverse or some other solution other than routing SIP calls to someone's proxy where they inject a SIP header with the LRN? For the past year we have been using a certain provider in Clevland who is having issues and seems to not be reliable.. I have heard of some using SS7 to get the LRN for a DNIS but haven't seen it work in a all VoIP environment. Is there a cost effective way to get this information or do you have to go the Neustar route? -- Jarrod Lash, <jarrod at fed-com.com> Federated Communications Office: +1-412-357-2127 Mobile: +1-412-999-0049 Fax: +1-412-545-8368

4 6

Defect rate
by hiersd＠gmail.com Sept. 2, 2009

Sept. 2, 2009

Hi, Do you ever feel like you're part of your vendor's QA department? Sometimes it seems that the number and severity of the patched defects seems to be pretty high in our field, and that most of the patched defects should have never made it out of QA and into GR in the first place. Thanks, David

1 0

network jitter tools
by carlos＠race.com Sept. 2, 2009

Sept. 2, 2009

Hey guys just putting a list together of tools to diagnose network jitter what are you guys using out there? -carlos

12 11

AT&T EDI
by carlos＠race.com Sept. 1, 2009

Sept. 1, 2009

Hey guys we are looking to move over to using edi billing interface with at&t has anyone used this form of billing with at&t? did you guys have to build your own edi interface or are there some commercial available solutions that was easy to implement into your current billing software? Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 F: 650.649.3551

1 0

network jitter tools
by carlos＠race.com Sept. 1, 2009

Sept. 1, 2009

I?ve heard this is a great product but holds a nice price tag to it as well. -carlos From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jason L. Nesheim Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:31 AM To: Nathan Stratton Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] network jitter tools You could also take a look at the Hammer XMS. http://www.empirix.com/products/hammer_xms_service_assurance.asp -- Jason Nesheim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Stratton" <nathan at robotics.net> To: "anorexicpoodle" <anorexicpoodle at gmail.com> Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:46:59 AM Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] network jitter tools On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, anorexicpoodle wrote: > Acme radius CDR's contain RTP statistics per-call for large scale > statistics collection. Not sure if/what other SBC's make this data > available. Covergence now acme also does. -Nathan _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps at voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

5 5

[Fwd: Voicemail message from: "UNAVAILABLE" <sip:3073330027@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx; isup-oli=0; user=phone>]
by abalashov＠evaristesys.com Sept. 1, 2009

Sept. 1, 2009

Anybody know who this clown is? I've been getting a lot of these. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Voicemail message from: "UNAVAILABLE" <sip:3073330027 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;isup-oli=0;user=phone> From: voicemail at sip.evaristesys.com To: abalashov at evaristesys.com "UNAVAILABLE" <sip:3073330027 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;isup-oli=0;user=phone> left a voice message of 91.80 seconds duration for you. It is attached. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775

2 1

N11 Services and Regulations for VoIP.
by drooster＠verizon.net Aug. 31, 2009

Aug. 31, 2009

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20090828/aee11f22/at…>

2 1

T38 over Sip
by juna＠is.co.za Aug. 31, 2009

Aug. 31, 2009

Howdy Ok so im trying to t38 over sip working with no luck My test lab is as follows: Pangea box connecting to a AS5400 via PRI, which then traverses an Acme Session director, broadsoft and then exits via PGW(SS7) The sniffer capture says ?failure to train? Any ideas? -- junaid Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confidentiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a mail to disclaimers at is.co.za and a copy will be emailed to you.

3 10

T38 over Sip
by KevorkB＠francoudi.com Aug. 31, 2009

Aug. 31, 2009

Disable ECM on Cisco gear (AS5400 and the exit gateway of PGW). You can disable ECM on the fax machine also. -----Original Message----- From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Junaid Hattia Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:03 PM To: Alex Balashov Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] T38 over Sip Attached is a call flow.... The basic prolem is that a fax call cannot be completed... On 2009/08/28 1:29 PM, "Alex Balashov" <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote: > There are many things that could be wrong there. Problem description > is not sufficient. > > Junaid Hattia wrote: > >> Howdy >> >> Ok so im trying to t38 over sip working with no luck >> >> My test lab is as follows: >> >> Pangea box connecting to a AS5400 via PRI, which then traverses an >> Acme Session director, broadsoft and then exits via PGW(SS7) >> >> The sniffer capture says ?failure to train? >> >> >> Any ideas? >> >> -- >> junaid >> >> >> >> >> >> Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer >> as displayed at the following link >> http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confidentiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. >> Should you not have Web access, send an email to >> mailto:disclaimers at is.co.za and a copy will be sent to you. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> VoiceOps at voiceops.org >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confidentiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a mail to disclaimers at is.co.za and a copy will be emailed to you.

6 6