- VoiceOps - lists.voiceops.org

[EXTERNAL] VoiceOps Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8
by Jamie.Montgomery＠comporium.com June 17, 2019

June 17, 2019

Cant say it's 100% correct, but based on LERG8's V & H coordinates, the two rate centers are 482 miles apart. It also shows that each rate center has two unique NPA's in them as well. I would think they would not be in the same local calling area, but I don't know Canadian tarrifs. Using a PERL script... Distance between Coord 1 (03003, 00615 [45.140833, -61.986178]), and coord 2 (03986, 01776 [45.397008, -71.891538]) is approximately: 482 miles Jamie M. -----Original Message----- From: VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org> On Behalf Of voiceops-request at voiceops.org Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 12:00 PM To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] VoiceOps Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8 Send VoiceOps mailing list submissions to voiceops at voiceops.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to voiceops-request at voiceops.org You can reach the person managing the list at voiceops-owner at voiceops.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of VoiceOps digest..." Today's Topics: 1. LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states (Julien Lamarche) 2. Re: LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states (Alex Balashov) 3. Re: LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states (Mark R Lindsey, ECG) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:36:19 -0400 From: Julien Lamarche <jlam at credil.org> To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states Message-ID: <7d22a018-533d-f6f7-6ee0-1188730fa867 at credil.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Hi, I was building an LCA file for a VoIP provider that uses Broadworks. I noticed that the LCA file examples I've been given only lists the rate center names, not the provinces. Yet in LERG6 and LERG8, short and long names for rate centers are not unique across all provinces / states. Sherbrooke QC and Sherbrook NS, for example, is listed as SHERBROOKE for both it's shot and long name. Should the LCA file distinguish these two rate centers by listing SHERBROOKE, QC as PQSHERBROOKE? If not, what field in NNACL should I use to distinguish them? Or do I have to start creating my own rate center names? Julien -- Make innovation easy http://www.credil.org/ ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:39:13 -0400 From: Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> To: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states Message-ID: <20190614193913.GA32221 at tlaquepaque.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii As far as I know the LERG does not have local calling tariff info per se. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:36:19PM -0400, Julien Lamarche wrote: > Hi, > > I was building an LCA file for a VoIP provider that uses Broadworks. > > I noticed that the LCA file examples I've been given only lists the rate > center names, not the provinces. Yet in LERG6 and LERG8, short and long > names for rate centers are not unique across all provinces / states. > > Sherbrooke QC and Sherbrook NS, for example, is listed as SHERBROOKE for > both it's shot and long name. > > Should the LCA file distinguish these two rate centers by listing > SHERBROOKE, QC as PQSHERBROOKE? If not, what field in NNACL should I use > to distinguish them? Or do I have to start creating my own rate center > names? > > > > Julien > > -- > Make innovation easy > http://www.credil.org/ > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps at voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:41:50 -0600 From: "Mark R Lindsey, ECG" <lindsey at e-c-group.com> To: Julien Lamarche <jlam at credil.org> Cc: voiceops at voiceops.org Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] LCA file for Broadworks across provinces / states Message-ID: <CACa+XsuW2R+G5TowE_z-o07c4gKS2x2NK8rsD+_S4B0NeSLF8g at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Are both SHERBROOKE ?s in the same LATA number? BroadWorks distinguishes the same names based on LATA. E.g., there are tons of ?Springfield?s and ?Albany?s in the US and Canada but in different LATAs. If you?re using BroadWorks LCA, then you?ll also need to load an NNACL-formatted file. (I think that?s usually excerpted from LERG6.) Of course, BroadWorks doesn?t really care where you get the data. It?s certainly possible to create inconsistencies. On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 13:36 Julien Lamarche <jlam at credil.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I was building an LCA file for a VoIP provider that uses Broadworks. > > I noticed that the LCA file examples I've been given only lists the > rate center names, not the provinces. Yet in LERG6 and LERG8, short and > long names for rate centers are not unique across all provinces / > states. > > Sherbrooke QC and Sherbrook NS, for example, is listed as SHERBROOKE for > both it's shot and long name. > > Should the LCA file distinguish these two rate centers by listing > SHERBROOKE, QC as PQSHERBROOKE? If not, what field in NNACL should I > use to distinguish them? Or do I have to start creating my own rate > center names? > > > > Julien > > -- > Make innovation easy > http://www.credil.org/ > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps at voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > -- Mark R Lindsey | Senior Member of Technical Staff / VP +1-229-316-0013 | Calendar: https://ecg.co/lindsey

1 0

AT&T Mobility Hawaii can not call Verizon Enterprise 808-822-2464
by anakaoka＠trinet-hi.com June 16, 2019

June 16, 2019

Hi, Hoping an at&t mobility engineer is on this list. Att mobility Hawaii towers can't call 8088222464 but can from US mainland towers so the tech support guys can't recreate it unless they are in Hawaii. 8088222464 is a Verizon Enterprise number and Verizon says they don't see the calls hitting their Network. They see the calls on the att network via ss7 but do not see the calls leaving att, so they can't make a ticket. Any help would be appreciated. Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901

1 0

Creating an International Rate Deck
by shripald＠gmail.com June 5, 2019

June 5, 2019

Hey group, I have a question that I have been struggling with for years and have never come up with a good solution for. It revolves around International Rate Deck creation, but i guess it could be for any tariff. We have multiple carriers for International, however, i'm trying out Thinq right now so we can use their LCR. Our other carriers aren't very successful with Intl. Thinq's rate deck to me is 6 carriers for each prefix, making it around 215,000 lines. The carrier(s) that have the lowest cost for each prefix varies, so i can't turn off the most expensive three or something like that. I was thinking of taking the least expensive 3 carriers and then averaging them and creating my rate from that average and then only allow Thinq to go 3 carriers deep. Does anyone have any experience with this? Are there any best practices? The second part of the question is how does one calculate the profit margin? Let's say you wanted to make 35% for retail and 20% for wholesale, but if you call UK landline, the cost is only 0.004. Your rate would be 0.0054 for retail and 0.0048, which is nothing. We have been doing something like If your cost is less than 0.03, then increase by 35% or 20% or whatever. however, that doesn't always work if the cost is super close to your target. Does anyone have any hard and fast rules that they use when creating decks? is there software that can help my puny brain think through this? Thanks ! Shri

6 14

AT&T LRN Issue?
by mwiles＠akabis.com May 29, 2019

May 29, 2019

Anyone from AT&T monitoring here? We have a customer that some AT&T customers cannot dial. I'm guessing it's related to a stale LRN. We ran into this recently with Windstream, and it was a bear to get addressed... but they finally did and admitted the error on their end. Or... anyone have a good channel to contact AT&T for such issues? Thank you, Mark

1 0

Issues between Peerless and Verizon Wireless
by dovid＠telecurve.com May 22, 2019

May 22, 2019

Hi, Is any one having issues between Verizon and Peerless networks? We have been hearing lot of complaints and from what we have been hearing it's issues with T1's on Verizons side. Has anyone else heard anything like this?

1 0

Google Voice Abuse Contact
by voiceops＠ics-il.net May 22, 2019

May 22, 2019

Does anyone have an abuse contact at Google Voice? I was recently contacted by a scammer and they directed me to contact a Google Voice number. It's via bandwidth.com, so I've reached out to them, but Google is going to have more information on the fraudster. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com

1 0

Looking for cost-effective eSBC that supports inband DTMF <-> RFC2833 transcoding support
by frnkblk＠iname.com May 14, 2019

May 14, 2019

We have an educational customer with an IVR that only supports RFC 2833 and an eSBC (Mitel border gateway) that cannot not perform transcoding from inband DTMF to RFC2833. There are some local VoIP to VoIP calls where the caller's device only supports inband DTMF and our softswitch cannot transcode them, so the IVR doesn't work for some parents and constituents. We'd like to recommend a cost-effective eSBC that supports inband DTMF <-> RFC2833 transcoding. Any recommendations from this group? I looked at EdgeMarc, but apparently their newer models don't have a DSP, or at least that functionality, anymore. Frank

5 7

termination carriers
by brianjenkins＠corp.sonic.net May 14, 2019

May 14, 2019

Hello, I work for a CLEC and we are looking into expanding our termination carrier list. I am hoping I could get some recommendation of carriers you have had good luck with. Thank You -- Brian Jenkins Network Engineer

3 3

Windstream Translations?
by mwiles＠akabis.com May 14, 2019

May 14, 2019

Anyone with Windstream, involved in translations, watching here and available for a Windstream problem? Thanks! Mark

2 1

Intermittent All Circuits Busy from Level3/CLink Inbound
by amoss＠flowroute.com May 10, 2019

May 10, 2019

Anyone else getting reports of intermittent issues with inbound calls to Level3 numbers this morning?? Appears to be impacting multiple ratecenters/latas 526 - FORT SMITH ARKANSAS VAN BUREN340 - DETROIT MICHIGAN DETROITZN1532 - WICHITA KANSAS MEADE It also appears their portal has gone down? =\ ADAM MOSSTechnical Account Manager | Senior Sales Engineer Customer Success+1.206.641.8034 (Direct DID)

1 0